TITLE

Prospects for Equal Employment: Conflicting Portents

AUTHOR(S)
Marshall, Ray
PUB. DATE
June 1965
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Jun65, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p650
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses several aspects of public policy measures against racial discrimination in employment in the United States. Compulsory versus voluntary measures; Role of the National Labor Relations Board; Provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
ACCESSION #
6006677

 

Related Articles

  • National Labor Law Institute Scheduled.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr70, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p248 

    This article reports on the current issues in equal employment and discrimination, U.S. National Labor Relations Board matters and collective bargaining that will be discussed by a a nationally prominent faculty at The National Labor Law Institute on May 14 and 15, 1970 in Chicago, Illinois. The...

  • RENEWAL OF UNION-SECURITY CONTRACTS.  // Labor Law Journal;Oct50, Vol. 1 Issue 13, p1058 

    The article reports that the renewal of a collective bargaining contract which had been entered into before the 1947 enactment of the Labor Management Relations Act was subject to the requirement of the U.S. National Labor Relation Board authorization for union-security agreements, even though...

  • Operator Must Prove Discharge Is Not Discriminatory.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan84, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p56 

    The article reports that the U.S. National Labor Relations Board test for mixed-motive discrimination cases requires employers to prove that the employee would have been discharged even if he had not engaged in protective activity under the NLRA. This theory may also apply to mine safety cases...

  • NLRB Priority and Injunctions for Discriminatory Discharges. Samoff, Bernard // Labor Law Journal;Jan80, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p54 

    Deals with the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) injunctions for discriminatory discharges. Number of employers firing workers for supporting unions during their organizing activities; Need for the NLRB to change a few regional procedures; Proposal to accelerate disposition of...

  • Fringe-benefit costs rise sharply.  // Banking;Jan77, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p21 

    Presents various information related to employee relations in the U.S. as of 1977. Increase in the cost of fringe benefits as a percentage of employee payroll; Changes in the U.S. National Labor Relations Board procedures; Controversy surrounding the proposed changes in federal...

  • Promoting discrimination.  // Monthly Labor Review;May78, Vol. 101 Issue 5, p65 

    Reports on the decision of the United States District Court for Eastern Michigan on the case, Detroit Police Officers Association v. Young. Court's ruling that the equal opportunity program cannot be achieved by the use of a racial quota which contradicts the constitutional mandate of the...

  • Has Affirmative Action Been Negated? A Closer Look at Public Employment. Sarokin, H. Lee; Babin, Jane K. // San Diego Law Review;Summer2000, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p575 

    Examines the concept of affirmative action as a preventive measure for public employment discrimination in the United States. Analysis of objections to affirmative action; Overview of affirmative action in the Supreme Court; Discussion on the aftermath of strict scrutiny to affirmative action...

  • Affirmative action's no panacea for corporate glass ceiling. Hodge, Sharon Brooks // National Minority Politics;Feb94, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p8 

    Examines the failure of affirmative action programs in eliminating racial discrimination in the workplace in the United States. Emergence of substantial number of black professionals into corporate America since 1970; Stigma placed on minority achievement; Impact of race relations beyond the...

  • Supreme Court approves suits by workers hurt by affirmative action.  // Corporate Board;Jan/Feb90, Vol. 11 Issue 60, p28 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's ruling allowing workers affected by affirmative action plans to file lawsuits alleging discrimination. Court-approved plans exposed to lawsuits by the ruling; Ruling of the court on the use of seniority systems.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics