TITLE

Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

PUB. DATE
September 1968
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Sep68, Vol. 91 Issue 9, p57
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Highlights court decisions on labor cases in the United States as of September 1968. Supreme Court's claim that amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act is constitutionally valid; Eligibility for union office rule.
ACCESSION #
6005979

 

Related Articles

  • Courtroom round-up. Aikin, Olga // People Management;11/30/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 24, p41 

    Presents British courts' decision on several cases involving employees' rights. Dismissal of union activist at Chemical Limited; Dispute on seniority rights caused by the merging of British Airways and British Caledonian; Confusion on the time limits for claims based on European law.

  • Comp benefit offset rejected. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;8/26/2002, Vol. 36 Issue 34, p1 

    Reports a court ruling offsetting federal longshoreman workers compensation benefits of an injured worker by settlements in San Francisco, California. Inequities of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act; Aggregation of the rule; Provisions of the act.

  • Be careful when hiring, firing . . . and other legal pointers. Scheider, Darlene // Wenatchee Business Journal;Jan2003, Vol. 17 Issue 1, pC7 

    Analyzes several court decisions concerning employment cases in Wenatchee, Washington state. Right of every employers to discharge employees without cause according to Washington common law; Cautious employers about giving job references; Overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

  • Franczek-Sullivan labor & employment report. Hall, Pamela B.; Dillon, Erika // Corporate Legal Times;Oct96, Vol. 6 Issue 59, p49 

    Presents various United States' (U.S.) courts rulings pertaining to labor and employment issues. Information on the ruling in the case `Eckles versus Consolidated Rail, 1996 U.S. Appeals LEXIS 20403 (7th Circuit August 14, 1996); Examples of other cases and rulings.

  • Wages against the machine. Aikin, Olga // People Management;9/27/2001, Vol. 7 Issue 19, p19 

    Presents several court rulings on cases related to wages in Great Britain. Dunlop Tyres Ltd. versus Blow and others; Laird versus A.K. Stoddard Ltd.; Unifi versus Union Bank of Nigeria Plc; Highlights of the cases.

  • OHIO LABOR LAW UPHELD ON APPEAL.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;10/15/2001, Vol. 247 Issue 16, p15 

    Reports the ruling of the court of labor agreements on state-funded projects in Ohio. Legality of the Open Contracting Act; Details of the law; Implications of the law.

  • Legal Q & A Agency workers. Willmott, Ben; Grocott, Charlotte // Personnel Today;5/13/2003, p13 

    This article presents answers to queries related to human resource management. A string of cases in the EAT suggested that workers supplied through agencies would not be employees of the client company. The Court of Appeal has opened a door for tribunals to look beyond the formal contractual...

  • LABOUR LAW CASES.  // Eastern Worker;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p7 

    The article provides a review of several court judgments for labor law cases in Pakistan as of April 2014. Topics discussed include rulings for cases involving the Payment of Wages Act (IV of 1936), the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), and the Industrial and Commercial Employment...

  • Laundry Allowance Not Part of Wages.  // Labor Law Journal;Mar83, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p182 

    The article focuses on the federal trial court ruling in the Donovan v. KFC Services Inc. case, that the value of cleaning kitchen workers' uniforms was not part of their wages for calculating equal pay. The question arose because a fast food chain paid for cleaning the uniforms of kitchen...

  • The Statute of Limitations Period in Duty of Fair Representation Cases: A Clarification. Gallagher, Daniel G.; Veglahn, Peter A. // Labor Law Journal;Dec87, Vol. 38 Issue 12, p776 

    This article examines the timeliness standards or limitation periods in light of decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the filings of duty of fair representation or breach of contract suits as of December 1987. Originally, hybrid duty of fair representation breach of contract suits were treated...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics