TITLE

Significant Decisions in Labor Cases

PUB. DATE
April 1975
SOURCE
Monthly Labor Review;Apr75, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p69
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions on various labor cases as of April 1975. Deferral policy of the National Labor Relations Board; Equal rights between men and women naval officers; Lower court decisions affirmed by the Supreme Court.
ACCESSION #
5991172

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Courting disaster. Kuehl, Sheila // Advocate;02/13/2001, Issue 831, p72 

    Criticizes the method of analysis used by the United States Supreme Court to decide whether the equal protection clause was violated. Disappointment over O'Connor and Kennedy's complicity in applying the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to stop the election recount; Benefits of the...

  • Supreme Court Report. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Dec78, Vol. 64 Issue 12, p1911 

    Discusses United States Supreme Court cases. Equal protection clause; Due process issues; Authority of a parent or guardian to commit minors to a mental health institution without hearing; Questions on the Fourth Amendment.

  • The Vote Case Fallout. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Feb2001, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p32 

    Focuses on issues concerning the equal protection violation resulting from the 5-4 decision against the Florida vote recounts on December 12, 2000. Effect of the decision on the reputation of the United States Supreme Court; Analysis of the decision.

  • All Men Are Created Equal. Slade, David C. // World & I;Dec98, Vol. 13 Issue 12, p98 

    Offers a look at the United States court cases which demonstrate equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, securing the right to all Americans of `equal protection of the law.' Brief review of the case of `Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F. (a Minor)'; `Carolyn...

  • Two types of discrimination: The familiar and the forgotten. Hellman, Deborah // California Law Review;Mar1998, Vol. 86 Issue 2, p315 

    Argues that Equal Protection doctrine fails to recognize the conceptual distinction between proxy and non-proxy discrimination. Inadequacy of the doctrine; Effect of the inadequacy to United States Supreme Court's treatment of discrimination cases; Distinction between proxy and non-proxy...

  • Rethinking the Peremptory Challenge: Letting Lawyers Enforce the Principles of Batson. Stoltz, Brian W. // Texas Law Review;Mar2007, Vol. 85 Issue 4, p1031 

    This article argues that the system established by the U.S. Supreme Court is not an efficient and effective way to guarantee the equal protection rights of both defendants and potential jurors. The author proposes modifying the peremptory challenge system by placing the mechanism for enforcing...

  • UMPIRES AT BAT: ON INTEGRATION AND LEGITIMATION. Siegel, Neil S. // Constitutional Commentary;Fall2007, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p701 

    The article identifies some conflicts between the understanding of the judicial role in the umpire analogy and the actual practice of constitutional adjudication in the student assignment cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. It examines the virtues and vulnerabilities of the umpire analogy...

  • COMMENT: FROM STEREOTYPES TO SOLID GROUND: REFRAMING THE EQUAL PROTECTION INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY STANDARD AND ITS APPLICATION TO GENDER-BASED COLLEGE ADMISSIONS POLICIES. SACHER, LINDSEY // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1411 

    In this article, the author discusses the equal protection jurisprudence of the U.S. Supreme Court. She highlights the application of the equal protection intermediate scrutiny standards on gender-based admission policies in higher education. She outlines the development of the anti-stereotyping...

  • Wronging Rights.  // National Review;7/23/1990, Vol. 42 Issue 14, p14 

    Reports on the United States Supreme Court ruling about racial classification of society. Existence of barriers in the country, particularly the Constitution's Equal Protection clause; Racial preferences for minorities; Justice's tolerance for undermining the civil rights of the innocent;...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics