TITLE

A Plea for Caution: Violent Video Games, the Supreme Court, and the Role of Science

AUTHOR(S)
Hall, Ryan C. W.; Day, Terri; Hall, Richard C. W.
PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
Mayo Clinic Proceedings;Apr2011, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p315
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
On November 2, 2010, the US Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Schwarzenegger v Entertainment Merchants Association, with a ruling expected In 2011. This case addressed whether states have the right to restrict freedom of speech by limiting the sale of violent video games to minors. To date, 8 states have tried to pass legislation to this effect, with all attempts being found unconstitutional by lower courts. In large part, the Supreme Court's decision will be determined by its review and interpretation of the medical and social science literature addressing the effects of violent video games on children. Those on both sides of the violent video game debate claim that the scientific literature supports their opinions. Some involved in the debate have proclaimed that the debate Is scientifically settled and that only people holding personal interests and biases oppose these "established truths." We review the historical similarities found in the 1950s comic book debate and studies Identified from a PubMed search of the term violent video games showing both the harmful and beneficial effects of these video games. We define factors that physicians need to consider when reading and stating opinions about this literature. Opinions from past court rulings are discussed to provide insight into how Judges may approach the application of these social science studies to the current legal Issue. Although on the surface the case of Schwarzenegger v Entertainment Merchants Association pertains only to the restriction of violent video games, it may establish principles about how medical and public health testimony can affect fundamental constitutional rights and how much and on what basis the courts will defer to legislators' reliance on unsettled science.
ACCESSION #
59803643

 

Related Articles

  • Trying juveniles as adults: A jurisprudent science perspective. Drogin, Eric Y. // Journal of Psychiatry & Law;Fall2007, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p407 

    The author examines trends in mental health science, mental health practice, and mental health roles, from a jurisprudent science perspective that focuses upon just, neutral, or unjust effects upon victims, offenders, and other affected parties. In Kent versus United States in 1966, the U.S....

  • The Civil Rights Act of 1991: Did it Really Overturn Wards Cove? Gullett, C. Ray // Labor Law Journal;Jul92, Vol. 43 Issue 7, p462 

    This article examines the significance of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to the overturning of recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings involving employment rights, including the case Wards Cove versus Atonio. Leaving aside the political pressures that resulted in the construction and...

  • IP in the Balance. PIERCE, EMMET // San Diego Business Journal;11/3/2014, Vol. 35 Issue 44, p15 

    The article reports that several U.S. Supreme Court decisions have made it difficult for the patent trolls to file lawsuits, which accuse businesses of infringing on vague and broadly worded patents. Attorney Tom Arno, a partner with Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP said that the issue of...

  • The Walker case.  // Columbia Journalism Review;Fall1966, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p2 

    This article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review a court case concerning the $500,000 libel award made by a Texas jury to retired major General Edwin A. Walker at the expense of The Associated Press in September 1966. The suit was but one of fifteen, totaling at one time...

  • Eminent Domain Goes Bust. Root, Damon // Reason;Jan2012, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p16 

    The article reports that in the Kelo v. City of New London case, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the seizure of private property for Pfizer Inc. in New London, Connecticut as it was part of a comprehensive redevelopment plan that would provide appreciable benefits to the community. The project...

  • DIRECT APPEALS FROM THREE-JUDGE COURTS.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1975, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p464 

    This article details the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case MTM Inc. versus Baxley, in which the Court held that direct appeals to the Supreme Court under 28 U.S. C. section 1253 would lie only when the three-judge panel below rendered a decision upon the constitutional merits of the claim....

  • The Missed Revolution: How Twombly and Iqbal Tilted the Legal Playing Field While Political Science Remained Silent. YACOBUCCI, PETER; MCGOVERN, PATRICK // Politics, Bureaucracy & Justice;2014, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p42 

    Two recent Supreme Court decisions, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009), sent shockwaves through legal and academic circles by introducing a plausibility requirement for all pleadings to be sufficient. Because of these decisions, the likelihood of dismissal in all...

  • Attorneys' Fees.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug83, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p540 

    The article discusses the judgments pronounced by the U.S. Supreme Court, that have delivered regarding the cases of attorney's fees. The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision in Manhart V. Los Angeles, which affirmed an award of attorneys' fees to claimants who prevailed on a...

  • Breach of Contract, Fair Representation.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug83, Vol. 34 Issue 8, p543 

    The article discusses judgments related to breach of contract, which have been delivered by various courts of the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the case of "Del Costello v. Teamsters" that the six-month limitations period of Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics