Poison Pill, Now Prescription Strength?

Cody, Tamika; MacFadyen, Ken
April 2011
Mergers & Acquisitions Report;4/4/2011, Vol. 24 Issue 14, p13
The article discusses the effectiveness of poison pills or shareholder rights plan adopted by companies in the U.S. Companies that have recently adopted such plan are Family Dollar, CCA Industries and Technology Research Corp. Airgas also have both a poison pill and a staggered board to ward off suitor Air Products & Chemicals.


Related Articles

  • Poison Pill, Now Prescription Strength? Cody, Tamika; MacFadyen, Ken // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Apr2011, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p14 

    The article focuses on a Delaware Chancery Court ruling that reinforced the reach of shareholder rights plans of Airgas Inc. that adopted both a poison pill and a staggered board to defend suitor Air Products & Chemicals Inc. As stated, although there has been a decline in the number of...

  • In an M&A-less Age, Holders Still Want Cos. to Swallow Pills. Cecil, Mark // Mergers & Acquisitions Report;7/15/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 27, p11 

    Reports on the data compiled by the Investor Responsibility Research Center on the vote of shareholders against poison pills.

  • POISON PILLS--Preserving Shareholder Value. Cernius, William J. // Orange County Business Journal;11/02/98, Vol. 21 Issue 44, p13 

    Focuses on the preservation of shareholder value due to poison pills in California. Uncertainty regarding the equity markets; Design of rights plan; Opportunities from down-market for common stocks.

  • Air Products abandons $5.9b Airgas bid.  // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Apr2011, Issue 838, p13 

    The article reports that Air Products has decided to abandon its plan to acquire rival firm Airgas due to the poison pill clause in the shareholder rights plan of the latter.

  • Court Decision Makes Poison Pills Easier to Swallow. Jaeger, Jaclyn // Compliance Week;Apr2011, Vol. 8 Issue 87, p50 

    The article discusses the decision of the Delaware Chancery Court over the case of Airgas Inc. board members. The court holds that the board members are within their rights to prevent shareholders from accepting a takeover bid from rival Air Products & Chemicals Inc. The decision reaffirms the...

  • Poison pills: 1980s vs. 1990s. Lee, Sharon K.; Pawlukiewicz, James E. // American Business Review;Jan2000, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p28 

    Provides evidence on the effect of a restrictive takeover defense such as poison pills on shareholders. Comparison on poison pill plans rates from the 1982-87 and the 1990-95 group; Significance of poison pills on stock holders; Wealth effects on the announcement of poison pill plans.

  • A Fresh Look at Poison Pills. Helman, Robert A.; Junewicz, James J. // Business Lawyer;May87, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p771 

    Focuses on the adoption of poison pill plans to protect minority shareholders from inadequate takeovers in the United States. Authority of the board of directors of a company to negotiate with potential acquirers; Approval of the plans.

  • No Way, Jose. Price, Margaret // Treasury & Risk Management;May/Jun99, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p51 

    Assesses the efforts of shareholders in dealing corporate governance issues in the United States. Proposed binding law amendment by the State of Winsconsin Investment Board; Impact of the proposed law on US companies; Use of resolution proposal binding through proxy contests by shareholders;...

  • Delphi shareholders ask company to withhold poison pill.  // Crain's Detroit Business;05/15/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 20, p6 

    Reports the opposition of shareholders of Delphi Automotive Systems to the enactment of poison pill by company board members in Michigan.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics