Senate Would Criminalize Laser Targeting of Planes

March 2011
Security: Solutions for Enterprise Security Leaders;Mar2011, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p18
Trade Publication
The article reports that the Senate has criminalize Laser Targeting of Planes in the U.S.


Related Articles

  • Surgeons angry at laser rebuke. Charters, Lynda; Greenberg, Kenneth A. // Ophthalmology Times;9/1/96, Vol. 21 Issue 23, p1 

    Reports on government policy on the use of excimer lasers in eye surgery in the United States. Ophthalmologists' criticism on the Food and Drug Administration's slow approval of excimer laser systems; Rebuke of ophthalmologists' use of the system without prior approval.

  • UK bans powerful laser pointers. Abbasi, Kamran // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);11/15/97, Vol. 315 Issue 7118, p1253 

    Reports that the British government has banned the most powerful laser pointers because they could cause retinal damage if shone directly into the eye. Findings of Ajoy Kar about the pointers; Different classification of the devices in Britain and the United States; Use of laser pens to impede...

  • Laser-Pointer Safety Ordinance.  // Public Management (00333611);May99, Vol. 81 Issue 5, p27 

    Focuses on an ordinance banning the misuse of laser pointers in Dearborn, Michigan. Terms of the policy; Importance of the rule.

  • Pointing Lasers At Aircraft May Become Felony In Arizona.  // AirGuide For the Frequent Flyer;2/3/2014, p63 

    The article reports on the insights of Representative Ethan Orr of Arizona on a legislation, which will consider pointing lasers at an aircraft as a felony.

  • Dear Mr. Know-It-All. Koerner, Brendan I. // Wired;May2010, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p26 

    The article presents questions and answers on various issues including whether to tape over the labels on pill bottles prior to going through airport security, whether a stranger who broke the camera of a tourist should acquiesce to the latter's demand to buy him a brand-new Canon, and how to...

  • FDA continues its crackdown on illegal excimer lasers. Zabel, Karen // Ophthalmology Times;10/01/97, Vol. 22 Issue 19, p64 

    Reports on the US Food and Drug Administration's continued efforts to crack down on users and manufacturers of illegal excimer lasers. Status of the agency's operations as of June 9, 1997; Licensed manufacturers of excimer lasers in the country; Agency's definition of black box lasers;...

  • Ready, set, go... Dalwyn, Elizabeth R. // Ophthalmology Times;4/3/95, Vol. 20 Issue 14, p9 

    Reports on the plan of American laser companies to gain approval from the US Food and Drug Administration on the use of excimer lasers for photorefractive keratectomy.

  • Leupold and Bushnell Reach Agreement.  // SHOT Business;Aug/Sep2010, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p11 

    The article reports on the settlement of a lawsuit between Leupold & Stevens Inc. and Bushnell concerning laser technology.

  • Laser hair removal: No training required? Kelsall, Diane // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;5/18/2010, Vol. 182 Issue 8, p743 

    The author reflects on laser hair removal operators in Canada who do not require a license. He comments that the organization Health Canada gives licence only to the machines required for laser hair removal and does not licence the operators in spite of effects such as scarring and burns. He...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics