Radical Constructivism Has an Answer -- But This Answer Is not an Easy One

Dykstra Jr., Dewey I.
November 2010
Constructivist Foundations;Nov2010, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p22
Academic Journal
C ontext • In spite of its advantages and its ability to make valid responses to objections, radical constructivism is not mainstream. > Problem • Extolling the virtues of radical constructivism and responding logically to the objections does not work. We know this from the evidence of many attempts. Our theoretical stance, radical constructivism, also suggests this approach is not likely to have much influence on realists. We cannot transmit understanding in the signals with which we attempt to communicate. How can we in radical constructivism enable those outside of RC to understand our explanation of human knowing? > M ethod • Examine our understanding of radical constructivism itself, because it is an explanation of how, why and under what circumstances people change their understandings of their experiential worlds. > Results • We must find ways to direct the attention of others to situations that they cannot explain with their existing understanding of the world. Then we must create conditions conducive to their revising and testing new understandings for fit with the evidence of their experience. > I mplications • Since radical constructivism is a theory of human knowing, it tells us how humans develop knowledge, hence it is an answer to the questions central to this special issue. This answer is not one to be used to win in debates with realists. Radical constructivism gives us an answer to the problem of engaging realists in understanding our position, but strategies consistent with radical constructivism are not easily carried out. Developing and executing such strategies is the work at hand.


Related Articles

  • Guest Editorial: Philosophy of Science in Practice and Practical Realism. Lõhkivi, Endla; Vihalemm, Rein // Studia Philosophica Estonica;2012, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p1 

    An introduction is presented in which the editors discuss various reports within the issue on topics including constructive realism, radical social constructivism, American historian Thomas S. Kuhn's concept of paradigm.

  • Towards a Radical Constructivist Understanding of Science. Riegler, Alexander // Foundations of Science;Mar2001, Vol. 6 Issue 1-3, p1 

    Constructivism is the idea that we construct our own world rather than it being determined by an outside reality. Its most consistent form, Radical Constructivism (RC), claims that we cannot transcend our experiences. Thus it doesn't make sense to say that our constructions gradually approach...

  • Why Radical Constructivism Has not Become a Paradigm. Gadenne, Volker // Constructivist Foundations;Nov2010, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p77 

    Problem • The paper investigates some reasons why RC has not become a mainstream endeavor. > Method • The central assumptions of RC are summarized. Analysis is made of how each of these assumptions corresponds to other views, especially to intuitive beliefs that are widely accepted....

  • Experiment and theory building. Patton, Lydia // Synthese;Feb2012, Vol. 184 Issue 3, p235 

    I examine the role of inference from experiment in theory building. What are the options open to the scientific community when faced with an experimental result that appears to be in conflict with accepted theory? I distinguish, in Laudan's (1977), Nickels's (1981), and Franklin's (1993) sense,...

  • Migration and radical constructivist epistemology. CANAPARO, CLAUDIO // Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture;2012, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p181 

    This article aims to explore the philosophical basis of classical radical constructivism (Piaget, Glasersfeld, Maturana) in the light of migration issues, with a general interest in the issue of housing theory (space) and the recent generated debate about cons tructivism therein. Thus, the...

  • Transcending Illusions and Illusions of Transcendence. Kenny, Vincent // Constructivist Foundations;3/15/2015, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p242 

    The article comments on the article "What Can the Global Observer Know?" by Diana Gasparyan published in the current issue of the journal. Topics include key notions of radical constructivism, elimination of notions including omniscient interpreter, and the doubt created by constructivism due to...

  • Open Peer Commentaries.  // Constructivist Foundations;Mar2016, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p385 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Going Beyond Theory: Constructivism and Empirical Phenomenology," by Urban Kordes in a 2016 issue.

  • Transformation of Intellectual Discourse on Collective Identities. Aleksandrovich Barkov, Fedor; Vladimirovich Lubsky, Anatoly; Anatolievich Lubsky, Roman // Middle East Journal of Scientific Research;2013, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p1425 

    Nowadays "rigid" and "soft" concepts of collective identities formed in the framework of essentialist and constructivist approaches to their interpretation have proved to be heuristically insufficient. This led to transformation of intellectual discourse upon collective identities based on the...

  • Realist Constructivism. Barkin, J. Samuel // International Studies Review;Fall2003, Vol. 5 Issue 3, p325 

    Constructivism appears to have taken a place in the literature on international relations (IR) theory in direct opposition to realism. Constructivists who claim their methodology is incompatible with realism focus on the association between realism and both materialism and rationalism. Realists...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics