Are CEOs worth 300 times more than the lowest-paid workers?

Francis, David R.
March 2011
Inside Tucson Business;3/18/2011, Vol. 20 Issue 43, p17
The article presents the view of the author on chief executive officers (CEO) receiving salary 300 times more than the lowest paid workers in the U.S. According to the author, CEOs are getting paid 300 times more compared during in the 1960's in which they are paid 30 times more. The author also mentions that CEOs merely managed to sway the members of the corporate board to give them a fantastic salary.


Related Articles

  • Executive Pay Today And Tomorrow. Reda, James F. // Corporate Board;Jan/Feb2001, Vol. 22 Issue 126, p18 

    Examines the role of boards of directors in reshaping the structure of chief executive officers' (CEO) salaries. Diversity in pay alternatives; Factors that affect how boards set CEO pay; Stagnation of CEO pay levels in the 1970s.

  • The Determination of Top Executive Pay: Importance of Human Capital Factors. Laing, David; Weir, Charlie // Journal of General Management;Summer98, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p51 

    Executive pay has been the subject of much recent discussion, with concern being expressed about the levels of pay received by the chief executive officers of companies. The aim of this paper is to analyze the influence of various human capital measures on the level of pay received by the...

  • Executive pay and its critics. Lochner Jr., Philip R. // Directors & Boards;Winter2000, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p37 

    Focuses on several ways that a board of directors and chief executive officers can follow to sidestep the issue of executive pay. Key elements of executive pay; Causes for the increase in salaries of executives; Importance of sharing information with shareholders about executive compensation. ...

  • A boards most crucial task. Horton, Thomas R. // Directors & Boards;Summer99, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p8 

    Discusses the selection of the chief executive officer by the corporate board of directors. Leader who can drive the company to success; Conventional tools in sizing up candidates; Reliable indicator of success; Relevant tract record; Involvement of entire board in the search; Directors'...

  • Hiring, firing and CEO succession planning: the board's toughest assignment. Lochner Jr., Philip R. // NACD Directorship;Dec99, Vol. 25 Issue 11, p4 

    Focuses on the board's hiring of chief executive officers (CEO) Reasons for the difficulty in hiring CEO; Factors to consider in hiring CEO; Lessons in planning for CEO succession.

  • Teaming up with the team. Horton, Thomas R. // Directors & Boards;Fall2000, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p10 

    Focuses on the characteristics of an ideal chief executive officer (CEO). Role of the board of directors in the selection of company CEO; Factors that influence a board's failure to select the appropriate CEO for the company; Responsibilities of a CEO.

  • A GOOD C.E.O. IS NOT HARD TO FIND. Surowiecki, James // New Yorker;7/2/2001, Vol. 77 Issue 17, p27 

    Examines the myth that there is a scarcity of qualified chief executive officers (CEO) that can be recruited to manage America's top-rated companies. Criteria of a typical board of directors hunting for a CEO; Track record of company executives overlooked for the position of CEO; Rationale for...

  • Ready, fire (the CEO), aim. Soder, Dee // Directors & Boards;Winter2001, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p92 

    Investigates the factors attributed to the termination of chief executive officers (CEO) in the United States. Assessment of the efficiency of boards of directors and the role of Wall Street in the decision of whether to dismiss a CEO or not; Developments surrounding the termination of a CEO.

  • The Impact Of Outside Director Equity Holdings On The Mix Of Outside Director Compensation. McClain, Guy // Journal of Applied Business Research;Mar/Apr2011, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p63 

    This study investigates the impact outside director equity holdings have on the determinants of the mix of equity in outside director compensation plans. The analysis, conducted over a 4 year period from 1997-2000, is based on a sample of 89 first time adopters of equity compensation. The use of...


Read the Article

Other Topics