TITLE

Overcoming Biases in Military Problem Analysis and Decision-Making

AUTHOR(S)
Tatarka, Christopher J.
PUB. DATE
January 2002
SOURCE
Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin;Jan-Mar2002, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the two most serious errors encountered by military intelligence professionals. Heuristics and biases in problem solving; Factors that led to biases for intelligence professionals.
ACCESSION #
5921728

 

Related Articles

  • The Persistent Cultural Script of Judicial Dispassion. Maroney, Terry A. // California Law Review;Apr2011, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p629 

    In contemporary Western jurisprudence it is never appropriate for emotion-anger, love, hatred, sadness, disgust, fear, joy-to affect judicial decision making. A good judge should feel no emotion; if she does, she puts it aside. To call a judge emotional is a stinging insult, signifying a failure...

  • THREE REASONS WHY THE CHALLENGED JUDGE SHOULD NOT RULE ON A JUDICIAL RECUSAL MOTION. Bassett, Debra Lyn // New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy;2015, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p659 

    The article explores the challenges faced by American judiciary due to unconscious biasedness of judges; role of arrogance or overconfidence in resulting biasedness; and discusses the potential dangers that resulted from unconscious bias, the bias blind spot, and the public position effect.

  • JUDICIAL RECUSAL: COGNITIVE BIASES AND RACIAL STEREOTYPING. Parks, Gregory S. // New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy;2015, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p681 

    The article explores the challenges faced by American judiciary due to unconscious biasedness of judges; role of cognitive biases and racial stereotyping in biased legal decision-making; and discusses some U.S. court cases concerning the issue including State v. Dodd and State v. Smulls.

  • An Adaptive Methodology for Developing Enemy Courses of Action. Kem, Jack // Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin;Jan-Mar2005, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p13 

    Discusses an adaptive methodology for developing enemy courses of action (ECOA) as part of the military decisionmaking process in the U.S. List of components to develop a COA; Importance of enumerating the enemy capabilities to develop ECOA; Information on the two types of ECOA.

  • Knowledge and anticipation. Boone, Philippe // Défense Nationale et Sécurité Collective;avr2008, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p20 

    The new strategic function of 'knowledge and anticipation, including intelligence' is currently being formalised in the new White Paper; this requirement has been articulated for many years and has already been the subject of fruitful methodological research within the Ministry of Defence (MOD)....

  • Study of Differences in Behavioral Biases in Investment Decision-Making Between the Salaried and Business Class Investors. Mittal, Manish // IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance;Dec2010, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p20 

    It has been established in the recent studies that investor behavior and asset price deviate from the prediction of simple rational models. The investment decisions of the investors are influenced by their biases and prejudices. Demographic factors like gender, age, income, education, wealth and...

  • The Convoluted Spectrum of White Guilt Reactions. Sheldon, Andrew // Jury Expert;Jul2010, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p52 

    The article presents the author's perspective on the article "The Convoluted Spectrum of White Guilt Reactions: A Review of Emerging Literature." He offers ways to evaluate a potential juror's racial bias by giving a White Guilt Scale which includes ingroup identity, awareness of white...

  • Emotions in the courtroom: "Need for affect" in juror decision-making. Griffin, Desir�e A.; Patty, Emily // Jury Expert;Jul2010, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p61 

    The article discusses the role of emotions in legal decision-making. It cites that individuals made decisions base on the mode-state, hence judgments are more affected by the mood-congruent information which typically done by juror when making decision on the fate of the defendant. It notes that...

  • Propagation of Individual Bias through Group Judgment: Error in the Treatment of Asymmetrically Informative Signals. Bottom, William P.; Ladha, Krishna; Miller, Gary J. // Journal of Risk & Uncertainty;Sep2002, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p147 

    Group decision making is commonly used injuries, businesses, and in politics to increase the informational basis for a decision and to improve judgment accuracy. Recent work on generalizing Condercet's jury theorem provides a compelling justification for using groups in this manner. But these...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics