TITLE

Forcible retirement can still be justified in certain circumstances

PUB. DATE
February 2011
SOURCE
People Management;2/10/2011, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the justification of mandatory retirement in Great Britain since the British government revoked the default retirement age of 65 for British workers. This is applied to the Seldon vs Clarkson Wright and Jakes appeal case, wherein the employer decided to keep its senior workers and devise a succession strategy. Employers are advised to handle performance appraisals and reviews, wherein job security must be based on performance instead of age to manage age discrimination in the workplace.
ACCESSION #
58832257

 

Related Articles

  • Bloxham v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA.  // Employers Law;Dec2007, p9 

    The article discusses two cases concerning objective justification in the context of age discrimination. In Bloxham v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, a British tribunal assessed whether reducing the pension of a partner amounted to direct age discrimination. In Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel...

  • Heyday frustrated by delays to mandatory retirement hearing.  // Personnel Today;2/6/2007, p2 

    The article reports that a European legal decision on the British government's mandatory retirement age has been hit by delays. Heyday, a spin-off of the charity Age Concern, claims that the British Department of Trade and Industry's transposition of the age discrimination regulations is...

  • Mandatory retirement age outdated.  // Accountancy Ireland;Feb2003, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p27 

    Reports that the mandatory retirement age is outdated and is in conflict with the age discrimination legislation that will take effect in 2006.

  • WHEN I'M SIXTY-FIVE. Davies, James // People Management;1/13/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p17 

    Focuses on a proposal of the government regarding a mandatory retirement age of employees in Great Britain. Significance of the proposal to age discrimination laws in the country; Background on the objective justification requirement for the retirement; Implications of the proposal for...

  • Mandatory Retirement. Chase, Dennis J. // Education Digest;Jan1975, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p46 

    The article focuses on the issue related to mandatory retirement for educators in the U.S. In spite of their small number, these angry educators are playing an important role in the anti-mandatory retirement movement currently sweeping some trades, crafts, and professions. They have skipped the...

  • CBI bullish on retirement age despite legal advice.  // Personnel Today;11/20/2007, p2 

    The article reports on the warning by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) that employers should not change their retirement policies. The CBI has ignored legal opinion in the wake of a judgment by the Employment Appeal Tribunal, which reversed an earlier decision that prevented an...

  • Settling old scores. Phillips, Lucy // People Management;7/26/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 15, p20 

    An interview with Ailsa Ogilvie, director of Heyday, an over-fifties organisation, is presented. Ogilvie discusses the reasons for the decision of Heyday to take the British government to court over the future of mandatory retirement ages. Ogilvie shares the status of the case in the European...

  • The Heavy Hand of the Law: The Canadian Supreme Court and Mandatory Retirement. Klassen, Thomas R.; Gillin, C. T. // Canadian Journal on Aging;05/01/1999, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p259 

    In the past two decades the Supreme Court of Canada made apparently contradictory rulings on mandatory retirement. In 1982, the Court ruled that mandatory retirement for firefighters at age 60 violated provincial human rights laws; in 1990, it found that forced retirement for university faculty...

  • The final countdown. Edwards, Gareth // Motor Transport;11/26/2009, p24 

    The article discusses the relevance of the right for employers in the haulage industry to retire people at 65. A default retirement age (DRA) of 65 was introduced by the British government in October 2006 as part of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006. In July 2006, Age Concern and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics