December 1984
Law & Philosophy;Dec1984, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p329
Academic Journal
The main aim of this paper is to challenge the validity of the distinction between legal justice and social justice. It is argued that what we usually call "legal justice" is either an application of the more fundamental notion of "social justice" to legal rules and decisions or is not a matter of justice at all. In other words, the only correct uses of the notion of legal justice are derivative from the notion of social justice and, hence, the alleged conflicts between criteria of social and legal justice result from the confusion about the proper relationship between these two concepts. Two views about the "social justice/legal justice" dichotomy are of particular importance and will provide the focus for the argument: this dichotomy is sometimes identified with a classical distinction between "distributive" and "commutative" justice and sometimes with the distinction between "substantive" and "procedural" justice.


Related Articles

  • Are Women Degenerating?  // America;1/8/1927, Vol. 36 Issue 13, p299 

    The article discusses about women and their demand for equality. The author agrees with Charles A. Richmond when he said that by attaching highly unconventional meanings to their efforts for equality with men, some women are degrading their womanhood instead of elevating it. The author also says...

  • In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. Segall, Shlomi // Social Theory & Practice;Apr2007, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p177 

    The article demonstrates that the luck-egalitarian account of distributive justice does not forbid helping those who lack discretion. The author examined 6 luck-egalitarian responses to the abandonment objection. He has justified the use of treating the imprudent in defense of a theory that is...

  • The (Stabilized) Nash Bargaining Solution as a Principle of Distributive Justice. Moehler, Michael // Utilitas;Dec2010, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p447 

    It is argued that the Nash bargaining solution cannot serve as a principle of distributive justice because (i) it cannot secure stable cooperation in repeated interactions and (ii) it cannot capture our moral intuitions concerning distributive questions. In this article, I propose a solution to...

  • Political Egalitarianism. Heath, Joseph // Social Theory & Practice;Oct2008, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p485 

    The article focuses on the concept of political egalitarianism. The phrase is used here to refer to a conception of egalitarian distributive justice that is capable of serving as the object of an overlapping consensus in a pluralistic society. It is argued that political egalitarianism must be...

  • The Role of a Merit Principle in Distributive Justice. Wilson, Catherine // Journal of Ethics;2003, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p277 

    The claim that the level of well-being each enjoys ought to be to some extent a function of individuals' talents, efforts, accomplishments, and other meritorious attributes faces serious challenge from both egalitarians and libertarians, but also from skeptics, who point to the poor historical...

  • Relative deprivation and social mobility: structural constraints on distributive justice judgments. Wegener, Bernd // European Sociological Review;May1991, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p3 

    In social justice research, evidence shows that-in western societies-a majority of the population considers their shares of material goods as just. A number of largely psychologically oriented models have been proposed to explain this astonishing finding. This paper goes beyond these statements,...

  • Call for Papers Symposium Critiquing Criminal Justice Policy and Administration.  // Administrative Theory & Praxis (M.E. Sharpe);Sep2015, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p222 

    The article presents a call for manuscripts on social, political and economic justice.

  • From the editorial collective... Hutchings, Katherine // Social Alternatives;Oct95, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p2 

    The article offers the author's comments on various issues related to social justice and equality in Australia. Social justice, equity and equality of opportunity have become focusing issues for labor, employer groups and government alike. Despite affirmative action and anti-discrimination...

  • Just Savings and the Difference Principle. Wall, Steven // Philosophical Studies;Oct2003, Vol. 116 Issue 1, p79 

    The issue of just savings between generations presents an important, and for the most part unappreciated, problem for Rawls's theory of distributive justice. This paper argues that the just savings principle, as Rawls formulates it in his recent work, stands in tension with the difference...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics