TITLE

Patent Watch

AUTHOR(S)
Harrison, Charlotte
PUB. DATE
March 2011
SOURCE
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery;Mar2011, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p168
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers drug patent news briefs in the U.S. The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has passed the bill that aims to bring substantial changes to patent law on February 3, 2011. Kyoto University in Japan and the U.S.-based iPierian Inc. agreed to avert a potential dispute surrounding ownership of technology related to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). In a district court, Novartis AG filed a complaint alleging infringement on three humanized monoclonal antibodies.
ACCESSION #
58701284

 

Related Articles

  • Novartis Pulls Out of India. S. H. // Pharmaceutical Executive;Oct2007, Vol. 27 Issue 10, p26 

    The article reports that Novartis AG has pulled out its investment plans for the Gleevec drug from India to China due to refusal of authorities. The company claimed that the Indian's patent laws do not fulfill World Trade Organization requirements. Novartis was challenging the country to grant a...

  • TRIALS AND TRIPS-ULATIONS: INDIAN PATENT LAW AND NOVARTIS AG V. UNION OF INDIA. Lee, Linda L. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2008 Annual Review, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p281 

    The article focuses on the emerging debate regarding intellectual property rights in India. Novartis AG v. Union of India has grabbed the attention of multinational pharmaceuticals concerned about the generic market and the international community concerned about India's compliance with the...

  • Sangstat Will Continue to Offer Cyclosporine Therapy.  // Worldwide Biotech;Sep99, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p1 

    Reports the continued offering of a lower cyclosporine therapy of SangStat, The Transplant Company in Fremont, California, in response to Novartis filing a patent infringement lawsuit against SangStat in the United Kingdom. Claims that Novartis has violated the antitrust laws; United States...

  • Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank & College Savings.... Polse, Jennifer L. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2000, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p373 

    Focuses on the case involving Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank and College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board on the issue on patent infringement in Berkeley, California. Violations on the Lanham Act and the Patent...

  • Streamlined procedure tackles patent cheats. Hunter, Joanne // Packaging Magazine;6/12/2003, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p5 

    Reports on the benefits of a streamlined litigation process that will make it cheaper and faster to fight patent infringers in England and Wales. Comments of patent and trademark solicitors Frank B. Dehn & Co. about the patent infringement litigation procedure; Advise to claimants and...

  • ASK THE COMMISH.  // Inventors' Digest;Mar2008, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p11 

    The article presents an answer to a question about the issue that Patent Reform Act of 2007 encourages infringement.

  • Recent Developments in Patent Law. Antush, Ronald A. // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;Fall99, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p71 

    Provides a review of selected patent opinions which involve significant decisions in areas of patent law in the U.S. Details of the case Pitney Bowes Inc. versus Hewlett-Packard Co.; Decision on the case of Festo Corp. versus Shoketsu Kinsoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.; Issues on sovereign immunity...

  • Recent Developments in Patent Law. Darrow, Christopher G. // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;Spring2002, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p379 

    Focuses on developments in patent laws in the U.S. Applicability of patenting plants; Challenges on the validity of a patent; Source of actual notice of infringement.

  • Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts Inc. v. Cardinal Industries, Inc. & Dawn Equipment Co. v. Kentucky... Schultz, Jason // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;1999, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p173 

    Focuses on restrictions imposed on the doctrine of equivalents (DOE) for the United States patent infringement cases, Chiuminatta Concrete Concepts Inc. v. Cardinal Industries Inc. and Dawn Equipment Co. v. Kentucky Farms Inc. Definition of doctrine of equivalents (DOE); Coextensive equivalents...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics