TITLE

More than $9 billion recovered from fraud

PUB. DATE
February 2011
SOURCE
Healthcare Risk Management;Feb2011, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
58552280

 

Related Articles

  • Newly Amended False Claims Act Expands Liability for Inadvertent Stark Law Violations.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (FERA), which expanded the liability provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA), ratified by U.S. President Barack Obama on May 20, 2009. The key role of the FCA in recovering fraud damages involving government funds is noted....

  • CONSUMERS AND REMEDIES: DO LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CLAUSES DO MORE HARM THAN GOOD? Harrison Williams, S. // South Carolina Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p663 

    The article focuses on the use of limitation of liability clauses in South Carolina and proposes changes to the courts' analysis of these clauses and the laws regarding the damage limiting clauses in contracts and the general effect of damage limiting clauses. It mentions that the liquidated...

  • Risk vs. Reality. Cunningham, Jeffrey M. // NACD Directorship;May/Jun2015, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p44 

    The author offers his perspective on liability of boards of corporate directors in the U.S.. He discusses topics such as his experience of defending corporate boards against lawsuits, the financial implications of these lawsuits, and refers to newspaper columnist Steven Davidoff Solomon's...

  • Doc groups back HEALTH bill. Zigmond, Jessica // Modern Healthcare;3/21/2011, Vol. 41 Issue 12, p46 

    The article focuses on the support by the Medical Group Management Association and the American Medical Association to the bill Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act of 2011.

  • COMPENSATING THE PUBLIC FOR DAMAGE TO THE ENVIRONMENT: CONFLICTING ECONOMIC DAMAGES WITH NONECONOMIC PROOF. Warden, Nicholas // Advocate (05154987);Mar/Apr2013, Vol. 56 Issue 3/4, p28 

    The article discusses economic damages, noneconomic proof, and compensation for the public in the aftermath of damage to the environment and the habitats of endangered species as of March 2013. A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruling in a case involving federal land in southern...

  • Friend This: Why Those Damaged During the Facebook IPO Will Recover (Almost) Nothing from NASDAQ. Short, Thomas L. // Washington & Lee Law Review;Spring2014, Vol. 71 Issue 2, p1519 

    The article discusses the reported reasons why those people who were apparently damaged during social networking company Facebook Inc.'s initial public offering (IPO) in 2012 will likely recover almost nothing from NASDAQ, focusing on self-regulatory organization (SRO) liability in America under...

  • SPLITTING THE BILL: CREATING A NATIONAL CAR INSURANCE FUND TO PAY FOR ACCIDENTS IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. Schroll, Carrie // Northwestern University Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p803 

    While self-driving cars may seem like something that can exist only in a futuristic movie, the technology is developing rapidly, and many states already allow test runs of self-driving cars on state roads. Many car companies have announced that they will make self-driving cars available as early...

  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND COMPENSATION IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE: HOW DOES THE U.S. DO IT? Hyman, David A.; Silver, Charles // Chicago-Kent Law Review;2012, Vol. 87 Issue 1, p163 

    This article describes the problem of health care error in the United States of America and the various regulatory, liability, and compensation systems that deal with medical mistakes. In terms of frequency, direct costs, and aggregate social costs, the problem of medical errors is staggering....

  • SEEKING ANTITRUST CLASS CERTIFICATION: THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL DAMAGE CALCULATIONS IN MEETING CLASS ACTION PREDOMINANCE REQUIREMENTS. Kamenir, Elena // George Mason Law Review;Fall2015, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p199 

    The article focuses on the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Comcast v. Behrend on proof of damages for class certification in antitrust class action suits regarding evidence and expert testimony. It mentions that liability and damages standards for Rule 23(b)(3) of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics