TITLE

The Representational Dispute

AUTHOR(S)
Hoffman, Robert B.
PUB. DATE
June 1973
SOURCE
Labor Law Journal;Jun73, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p323
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article looks at both past and pending U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and court decisions. In the U. S. Supreme Court decision on the case of Carey v. Westinghouse, it declared a dispute between two unions as "so-called jurisdictional dispute," that may involve either "representation" or a "work assignment". The Taft-Hartley Amendments of 1947 gave the NLRB a statutory basis for resolving and stopping "jurisdictional" disputes. In the inconsistent arbitration awards involving McDonnell and Co., NLRB argued the dispute involved a "representation" and not a "work assignment" issue.
ACCESSION #
5818601

 

Related Articles

  • Withdrawal of Recognition Upheld.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug87, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p544 

    The article reports on the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) ruling on several labor cases. In the case of Wilshire Foam Products, the NLRB ruled that an employer acted lawfully by relying upon decertification petitions to announce withdrawal of recognition based on a good-faith doubt...

  • Board Rule That Statements Implied Unlawful Surveillance.  // Labor Law Journal;Mar92, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p154 

    This article deals with the position of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board in the lawsuit involving United Charter Service Inc. in 1992. The agency ruled that statements made by an operations manager of the company to one of the bus drivers of the firm, which indicated that he had...

  • STRIKE THREAT AGAINST EMPLOYEE.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan50, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p317 

    The article reports that a union's threat to strike in order to force an individual employee to take part in union activities was outlawed by the National Labor Relations Board as illegal "restraint and coercion," as well as discrimination.

  • The NLRB on Craft Severance: One Year of American Potash. Krislov, Joseph // Labor Law Journal;May55, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p275 

    The article comments on the current labor problem concerning craftsmen and their dispute with the old industrial theories of organizations in the U.S. The National Labor Relations Board's decision in the "American Potash case" established new requirements for craft units seeking to sever...

  • THE N. LABOR RELATIONS B.-- WHAT IT SAYS AND HOW IT ACTS. FITZPATRICK, BERNARD H. // America;5/11/1940, Vol. 63 Issue 5, p116 

    The article presents the author's comments on how the National Labor Relations Act least favors the employees in the U.S. By citing several court cases involving labor disputes, the author accuses the National Labor Relations Board of being ineffective and states that the Act doesn't allow...

  • Union's Preelection Reimbursement Doesn't Influence Vote.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan73, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p56 

    The article reports the U.S. National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) ruling that a union's reimbursement of a majority of unit employees for wages lost while they were attending a representation proceeding was not grounds for setting aside the subsequent election. It also reaffirmed its...

  • Absence of Sale and Purchase Doesn't Bar Successor Relationship.  // Labor Law Journal;Feb69, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p124 

    This article presents the court decision on a labor dispute on business succession with reference to the case of Tom-A-Hawk Transit Inc. Even though a bus company taking over the operations of another such company did not purchase any of the old company's buses, the new company was a successor...

  • Picketing Permitted at Terminal in Lieu of Trailer Docks.  // Labor Law Journal;Aug70, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p558 

    This article reports on a decision of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) that a union's picketing that took place at the entrance to truck terminals was lawful, in 1970. According to the NLRB, the terminal entrance picketing conformed to the Moore Dry Dock standard requiring that...

  • Supreme Court: Resignation Stops Union Fine for Strikebreaking.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan73, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p54 

    The article reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the case of NLRB v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers, Local 1029. The court ruled that a union may not fine a former member who first resigns, then crosses a picket line to return to work. However, the court emphasized that the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics