TITLE

NUCLEAR DIPLOMACY: BRITAIN, FRANCE AND AMERICA

AUTHOR(S)
Pierre, Andrew J.
PUB. DATE
January 1971
SOURCE
Foreign Affairs;Jan1971, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p283
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article focuses on the nuclear diplomacy between Great Britain, France and the U.S. In so far as strategic weapons are concerned, Britain, France and the U.S. might enter into a new set of nuclear relationships. Collaboration on nuclear weapons technology between London, England and Paris, France would receive the support of the U.S. as would the coordination of the targeting of the two forces. In turn, their joint targeting plans would be coordinated with those of the U.S. in the same manner as the British plans have been coordinated in the past. In practice both the ultimate command and control decisions, as well as the ownership of the forces, would remain in the hands of the respective national authorities. Britain and France would accordingly have three sets of target plans: Alliance, European and National. The British and French forces might become subject to the advisory guidelines of a European Nuclear Committee (ENC) on which the non-nuclear countries would be represented. This would be of special importance to the Federal Republic of Germany as the only major West European power without an independent nuclear capability. The ENC would permit the formulation of a European perspective on planning for contingencies and political guidelines on the use of nuclear weapons. A unified European view might thereby be presented to the U.S. The ENC would also be an appropriate forum for discussion of the problems associated with the next generation of the European nuclear forces. In time, the non-nuclear countries might contribute to their maintenance either through joint production of delivery systems or through common financing. This arrangement would not involve a breach of the Non-Proliferation Treaty since it would not include a transfer of nuclear weapons, or of their control, to non-nuclear powers.
ACCESSION #
5810948

 

Related Articles

  • Paris, Pretoria, Peking…Proliferation? Quester, George H. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Oct1970, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p12 

    The article discusses about the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) between the U.S., Soviet Union, Great Britain, France and China. In this report, the author comments on the indifference of France and China who refuses to sign and ratify the treaty. The author also indicated the potential...

  • West Joins China, Russia to Promote Nuke-Free Central Asia. Weitz, Richard // World Politics Review (Selective Content);5/13/2014, p1 

    The article reports that the governments of France, Great Britain and the U.S. have signed the protocol to the Central Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Agreement, as of May 2014. Topics discussed include the enforcement of the zone once the protocol is ratified by the five states that signed it on...

  • How "Special"? For How Long? O'Sullivan, John // National Review;2/5/2001, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p18 

    Discusses foreign relations between the U.S. and Great Britain. Continuation of the cooperation that began during the Cold War; Role of the British in European-American relations following a recent New Atlantic Initiative conference in London; Criticism of the U.S.-Great Britain nuclear...

  • DISARMAMENT.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1957, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p36 

    The article reports global developments related to nuclear warfare and disarmament. On The Soviet Union sent notes to the U.S., Britain, France, India, and China containing a seven-point disarmament plan which included a partial acceptance of President Dwight Eisenhower's open skies suggestion....

  • The Isolation of France.  // New Republic;4/9/30, Vol. 62 Issue 801, p203 

    Focuses on a conference attended by American delegates, held in London, England with an objective to persuade France to reduce her naval program under consultation pact. Argument that the success of the conference depends the U.S. to assuring her military aid against a future enemy; Reluctance...

  • Holding their feet to the fire. Zuckerman, Mortimer B. // U.S. News & World Report;11/17/2003, Vol. 135 Issue 17, p76 

    Comments on Iran and its designation as an active state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. State Department. Reasons that President Bush included Iran in the axis of evil; Discussion of Iran's breach of international agreements by developing a nuclear-weapons facility; Finding of the International...

  • Secret diplomacy. Stanglin, Douglas; Fenyvesi, Charles // U.S. News & World Report;6/12/95, Vol. 118 Issue 23, p25 

    Reports that France and Britain were not given any advance warning of President Bill Clinton's apparent policy shift in offering the temporary use of United States troops in Bosnia. Reaction to the news, according to diplomatic insiders.

  • Joint statement by France, United Kingdom, and the United States on the South Pacific Nuclear...  // Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents;3/25/96, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p544 

    Presents a joint statement by France, Great Britain, and the United States on the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty. Terms of the agreement.

  • British consul says French damaged themselves, not U.S. O'Connor, Terry // New Orleans CityBusiness (1994 to 2008);4/28/2003, Vol. 23 Issue 44, p25 

    Focuses on the strong United States-Great Britain relationship. Shared benefits in democracy, free markets and free trade; Leadership personalities of United States and Great Britain.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics