TITLE

Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership

AUTHOR(S)
Horner, Jennifer; Minifie, Fred D.
PUB. DATE
February 2011
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Feb2011, Vol. 54 Issue 1, pS330
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: In this series of articles—Research Ethics I, Research Ethics II, and Research Ethics III—the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity. In Research Ethics II, the authors review the RCR domains of mentoring, collaboration, peer review, and data management and ownership. Method: They relied on authoritative documents, both historical and contemporary, insightful commentary, and empirical research in order to identify current issues and controversies of potential interest to both faculty and students. Conclusions: The authors close by urging readers to stay abreast of the manifold ethics issues facing today's community of scientists, policymakers, and research institutions, and to adhere to best practices as they evolve.
ACCESSION #
58034144

 

Related Articles

  • 'The honesty of science is being compromised at every turn' Tudge, Colin // New Statesman;4/26/2004, Vol. 133 Issue 4685, p29 

    Examines how the honesty of scientists is being compromised. Why we can no longer rely on what scientists tell us; Industry sponsorship of conferences and papers, concealment of bad results; Why many scientists seem content to put up with input from commerce; How industry and science are...

  • Information from drug companies and opinion leaders. Liberati, Alessandro; Magrini, Nicola // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);5/31/2003, Vol. 326 Issue 7400, p1156 

    Editorial. Presents the view that there is a need for a common set of rules if pharmaceutical companies and opinion leaders want to save their credibility. View that the asymmetry in the information available to health professionals and consumers is a fundamental barrier to rational and...

  • Drug companies advised to publish unfavourable trial results. Singh, Debashis // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);5/31/2003, Vol. 326 Issue 7400, p1163 

    Reports that guidelines aimed at increasing transparency and encouraging the responsible and ethical reporting of industry-sponsored clinical trials have been published in "Current Medical Research and Opinion," a peer-reviewed journal which focuses on evidence-based clinical studies, research...

  • A Poor Performance. Ewington, Teresa // Training Journal;Oct2014, p27 

    The article discusses employee performance management program commonly known as appraisals and the importance if effective writing skills by the management teams during the process of appraisals. Topics include stress that is triggered due to bad appraisals, role of learning and development team...

  • EDITOR'S COMMENTS: MENTORING COLLEAGUES IN THE CRAFT AND SPIRIT OF PEER REVIEW. Carpenter, Mason A. // Academy of Management Review;Apr2009, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p191 

    The article introduces this issue of "Academy of Management Review" and the topics of peer review, mentoring, and editorial policy.

  • Merits of collaboration between industry and academia. Evans, Charlotte E. L.; Greenwood, Darren; Burley, Victoria; Cade, Janet // BMJ: British Medical Journal;3/7/2015, Vol. 350 Issue 7998, p22 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Sugar: Spinning a Web of Influence," by J. Gornall in the February 11, 2015 issue.

  • Journals and Pharma Collaborate on New Recommendations to Close Credibility Gap in Industry-Sponsored Research.  // AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal;2012, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p81 

    The article offers information on the "Ten Recommendations for Closing the Credibility Gap in Reporting Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research" guidelines for medical communicators which were created through the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices (MPIP) roundtable. It states that the...

  • Model World: Ethics in the Not So Real MS/OR World. Gas, Saul I. // Interfaces;Nov/Dec94, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p74 

    Features a discussion of ethical situations related to students and academics that is based on presentations made at recent Operations Research Society of America (ORSA) doctoral student colloquia. Credit and the order of authorship of journal papers; Data availability and computational...

  • Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Research. Horowitz, Herschel S. // Journal of Dental Research;Jun1990, Vol. 69 Issue 6, p1345 

    The author discusses the importance of conducting ethical research. Discussing events that have brought research ethics to the attention of the public, the author examines the differences between scientific fraud and just poor research. The author believes that the self-regulation method of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics