TITLE

Dichotic Word Recognition in Noise and the Right-Ear Advantage

AUTHOR(S)
Roup, Christina M.
PUB. DATE
February 2011
SOURCE
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Feb2011, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p292
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Purpose: This study sought to compare dichotic right-ear advantages (REAs) of young adults to older adult data (C.M. Roup, T. L.Wiley, & R. H.Wilson, 2006) after matching for overall levels of recognition performance. Specifically, speech-spectrum noise was introduced in order to reduce dichotic recognition performance of young adults to a level consistent with that of older adults with hearing loss. Method: Dichotic word-recognition performance was evaluated in the free-recall response paradigm across 2 conditions: (a) quiet and (b) noise (+11 dB signal-tonoise ratio). Participants included a group of right-handed young adults (n = 32) with normal hearing. Results: The introduction of noise resulted in significantly poorer dichotic word-recognition performance than in the quiet condition for the young adults. REAs, however, did not differ between the 2 conditions. Relative to the Roup et al. (2006) older adult data, performance of the young adults in the noise condition resulted in (a) similar levels of overall recognition performance and (b) significantly smaller REAs. Conclusions: Results suggest that the magnitude of the REA is not dependent upon the difficulty of the dichotic task. Rather, the large REAs exhibited by older adults are more likely related to age-related deficits in auditory processing.
ACCESSION #
58034135

 

Related Articles

  • Directional Benefit Is Present with Audiovisual Stimuli: Limiting Ceiling Effects. Aspell, Elizabeth; Picou, Erin; Ricketts, Todd // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Jul/Aug2014, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p666 

    Background: Past research demonstrates that as the speech recognition performance of listeners fitted with omnidirectional hearing aids approaches maximum (ceiling), the benefit afforded by directional microphones is necessarily lessened. This effect could potentially eliminate the benefit...

  • Effects of Advancing Age and Hearing Loss on Gaps-in-Noise Test Performance. John, Andrew B.; Hall Iii, James W.; Kreisman, Brian M. // American Journal of Audiology;Dec2012, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p242 

    Purpose: The present study evaluated the effects of advancing age and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) on approximate temporal gap detection thresholds obtained from the Gapsin- Noise (GIN; Musiek et al., 2005) test. Method: Approximate thresholds from the GIN test were compared among 3 groups...

  • CEREBRAL PROCESSING OF SPEECH PRESENTED MONAURALLY TO LEFT-HANDED SUBJECTS. Slorach, Neil // Language & Speech;Apr-Jun77, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p142 

    Discusses the relationship between handedness and cerebral dominance for speech processes. Demonstration of the lateralization of speech perception; Complexities in the classification of handedness; Aspects of the speech process.

  • The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a Multiple Signal-to-Noise Ratio Paradigm. Wilson, Richard H.; Mcardle, Rachel; Watts, Kelly L.; Smith, Sherri L. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Sep2012, Vol. 23 Issue 8, p590 

    Background: The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN; Bilger, 1984b) is composed of 200 target words distributed as the last words in 200 low-predictability (LP) and 200 high-predictability (HP) sentences. Four list pairs, each consisting of two 50-sentence lists, were constructed...

  • A Speech Perception Test in Simulated Reverberation Conditions. Spitzer, Jaclyn B.; Sandridge, Sharon A.; Newman, Craig W.; Sydlowski, Sarah; Ghent Jr., Robert M. // American Journal of Audiology;Jun2015, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p169 

    Purpose: This study developed new test materials by applying various reverberation treatments to sentences having high and low contextual redundancy. Method: The Speech Perception in Noise-Revised (SPIN-R; Bilger, Nuetzel, Rabinowitz, & Rzeczkowski, 1984; Kalikow, Stevens, & Elliott, 1977)...

  • Suprathreshold Auditory Processing and Speech Perception in Noise: Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners. Summers, Van; Makashay, Matthew J.; Theodoroff, Sarah M.; Leek, Marjorie R. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Apr2013, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p274 

    Background: It is widely believed that suprathreshold distortions in auditory processing contribute to the speech recognition deficits experienced by hearing-impaired (HI) listeners in noise. Damage to outer hair cells and attendant reductions in peripheral compression and frequency selectivity...

  • Audiometric hearing status of individuals with and without multiple sclerosis. Lewis, M. Samantha; Lilly, David J.; Hutter, Michele M.; Bourdette, Dennis N.; McMillan, Garnett P.; Fitzpatrick, Mary A.; Fausti, Stephen A. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2010, Vol. 47 Issue 7, p669 

    The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether differences exist in audiometric hearing status between individuals with and without multiple sclerosis (MS) and between individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and individuals with secondary progressive MS (SPMS)....

  • Hearing Impaired Children's Preference for, and Performance with, Four Combinations of Directional Microphone and Digital Noise Reduction Technology. Pittman, Andrea L.; Hiipakka, Mollie M. // Journal of the American Academy of Audiology;Oct2013, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p832 

    Background: Before advanced noise-management features can be recommended for use in children with hearing loss, evidence regarding their ability to use these features to optimize speech perception is necessary. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between children's...

  • Spectral Contribution to the Benefit From Spatial Separation of Speech and Noise. Dubno, Judy R.; Ahlstrom, Jayne B.; Horwitz, Amy R. // Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research;Dec2002, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p1297 

    Presents information on a study that assessed the use of interaural difference cues that underlie the spatial separation benefit for speech recognition in noise by younger and older adults with normal hearing and older adults with hearing loss. Research methods; Results and discussion on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics