TITLE

WHY COURTS ARE ALWAYS MAKING LAW Most judges hate to admit that they make social and political choices. It's time to get the truth out in the open

AUTHOR(S)
FRUG, JERRY
PUB. DATE
September 1989
SOURCE
Fortune;9/25/1989, Vol. 120 Issue 7, p245
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
57867968

 

Related Articles

  • The Chasm Is Growing What Do You do When Communicators and Executives Are on One Side, and Everyone Else Is on the Other? Jensen, Bill // Communication World;Oct/Nov2003, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p14 

    The full truth always includes dissent. That's why people bury it or spin it. The full truth would not make bosses happy; that's why it is packaged. The full truth does not appear in most of the speeches that are written, or the videos, meetings, newsletters and web sites that are produced. The...

  • A Necessidade de (re)Pensar a Realização do Direito em Tempos de Protagonismo Judicial - Um Percurso Possível em Busca de uma Reflexão Refundadora de um Novo Sentido. Aroso Linhares, José Manuel; de Faria Silvestre, Ana Carolina // Revista Seqüência;2011, Vol. 32 Issue 63, p113 

    Law is inserted in the world of life. It is therefore inextricably linked to social, cultural, economic and political contingencies. Law is a dynamic science, which implies considering that new issues may become object of its interest or old issues may require current and committed reflections....

  • JUSTICE CALLINAN'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE LAW OF TORTS. TAYLOR, GREG // University of Queensland Law Journal;Apr2008, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p91 

    The essay discusses Australian High Court Justice Ian Callinan's record in the cases in the law of torts in which he participated during his tenure of judicial office. The author notes that the most striking of Callinan's judgments to which he refers is the extent to which judicial choice and...

  • How the Constitution disappeared.  // Commentary;Feb1986, Vol. 81 Issue 2, pl9 

    Attorney General Meese thinks that judges should interpret the Constitution as intended by those who wrote and ratified it, which states the basic premise of our political-legal system, and that the function of judges is to apply, not make, the law. Should the US Supreme Court decide issues of...

  • OTHER VOICES: Uncertainty reigns when judges make law. Steinberg, Richard // Crain's Detroit Business;9/27/2004, Vol. 20 Issue 39, p9 

    The article comments that there is always some degree of uncertainty in the law because courts have the countervailing responsibility to ensure the law keeps pace with changing social mores and expected behaviors. Political polemics have, in recent years, praised those judges who regularly hew...

  • Was Zurich action needed? Atkinson, Rebecca; Mylward, Luci // Mortgage Strategy;11/28/2005, p21 

    The article presents the views of several executives on the settlement out of court of the dispute between Home of Choice and Zurich. Jonathan Cornell of Hamptons International Mortgages stated that the costs and time involved make it hard to see what the firm gets out of it. Richard Griffiths...

  • INTERPRETACINIS ŽAISMAS, ARBA KAIP KURTI TEISĘ BE PARLAMENTO. Mikelėnas, Valentinas // Jurisprudencija;2009, Vol. 2 Issue 116, p79 

    The contemporary State power is concentrated in the hands of the legislative, executive and judicial powers, which is traditionally referred to as the principle of the division of State power. The separation of State power and the attribution of the function of the interpretation and application...

  • Government by the People. Heinrichs, Ann // Maryland;2003, p18 

    The article describes the politics and government of Maryland. Marylanders know a lot about government. It's state government is set up just like the U.S. government. It's divided into three branches, legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch makes the state laws. Maryland's...

  • Justice Clarence Thomas' day job. Sowell, Thomas // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;6/26/2006, Vol. 35 Issue 51, p19 

    Discusses the views of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on issues related to the interpretation and application of the law. Reason why a judge should not make a social policy; Remarks from Thomas regarding retrospective laws and the policy-laden judgments made by the Supreme Court;...

  • Comment.  // Management Services;Dec1988, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p5 

    We are now in the age of over-kill information. Never has there been a time when people have been so bombarded with visual and auditorial signals. You can now sit all day and night looking at television and listening to radio while waiting for an endless stream of freebie newspapers and color...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics