TITLE

WHY DIRECTORS KEEP GETTING SUED Court rulings, sometimes bizarre, practically ensure that every takeover try will end up in litigation -- costing shareholders plenty

AUTHOR(S)
OLSON, WALTER
PUB. DATE
March 1989
SOURCE
Fortune;3/13/1989, Vol. 119 Issue 6, p143
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
57867176

 

Related Articles

  • Delaware Court Issues Key Takeover Rulings.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2011 Q1, Special section p1 

    The article discusses two court cases in Delaware wherein the opinions issued by the chancery court are of significance to the boards of public companies involved in takeover bids. In the case Air Products & Chemicals v. Airgas Inc., the court found that Airgas' board of directors had no duty to...

  • Bally Shareholders Drop Lawsuits. Fischbach, Amy Florence // Fitness Business Pro;Mar2006, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p12 

    The article reports on the agreement between Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. and its two largest shareholders to drop all pending litigation after proxy battles in the U.S. A proxy contest was waged by Pardus Capital Management that owns Bally's stock to overtake Bally's board of directors....

  • District court orders Chubb unit to pay $24M to D&O policyholder. Casale, Jeff // Business Insurance;10/1/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 40, p45 

    The article reports a court ruling which compels Chubb Corp. unit Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. to pay $24 million to directors and officers liability policyholder AFC Enterprises Inc. over a claim related to AFC's settlement of shareholder litigation. The unit sued AFC, owner of the Popeyes...

  • THE POWER TO DECIDE ON TAKEOVERS: DIRECTORS OR SHAREHOLDERS, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? Gatti, Matteo // Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law;2014, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p73 

    This Article analyzes the allocation of the power to decide on hostile takeovers as between directors and shareholders. In it I show who actually has power in a takeover and what factors are at work to grant that authority. Although directors are traditionally considered to be in charge of...

  • SEC Takes Aim At 'Best Price' Rule. O'Connor, Colleen Marie // Investment Dealers' Digest;1/9/2006, Vol. 72 Issue 1, p9 

    The article presents information on the proposed amendments of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The commission's proposed amendments to the best price rule in mergers and acquisitions tender offers hold up after its comment period ends on February 21, 2006. The best price rule was...

  • Delaware Court Upholds Forum Selection Bylaws. Jaeger, Jaclyn // Compliance Week;Oct2013, Vol. 10 Issue 117, p25 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Delaware Chancery Court on the protection of company by-laws against shareholder claims. According to Chancellor Leo Strine, the ruling could ease up the costly burden of multi-forum litigation. On the other hand, investor groups argue that the by-laws...

  • Judge rules for policyholder. McLeod, Douglas // Business Insurance;09/20/99, Vol. 33 Issue 38, p3 

    Reports on the court ruling in Owens Corning's claim against the National Union Fire Insurance Co. to cover the cost of shareholder litigation against the asbestos producer's directors and officers. Terms of the ruling; Case background; Initial ruling made in the case.

  • The Rule of law. Nicholls, Will // Nation (1206-2642);8/10/2012, Vol. 19 Issue 20, p3 

    The author shares his insights about the rule of law in Canada. He feels that the rule of law in Canada is not so blind or predisposed to honour the principle that every person is equal under the law when the individual concerned has Aboriginal blood. He cites the number of First Nations trying...

  • THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE: BURKS v. LASKER AND OTHER RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. Brown, Meredith M.; Phillips, William J. // Journal of Corporation Law;Spring81, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p453 

    The business judgment rule has recently become a more potent weapon for defending shareholder derivative actions against the directors of a corporation. Traditionally, the rule has been invoked to provide directors with a defense on the merits to a shareholder suit. Under the rule, a director...

  • Delaware court decisions toughen board takeover decisions.  // Corporate Board;Jan/Feb94, Vol. 15 Issue 84, p25 

    Reports on several court decisions in Delaware that tighten standards to be met by directors of corporations in considering buyout offers. Delaware Supreme Court's ruling that directors must provide shareholders with maximum value when considering the sale of a public company; Delaware Chancery...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics