Farnham, Alan
July 1988
Fortune;7/18/1988, Vol. 118 Issue 2, p10
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Dr Pepper Stock, Dividends Pop. SCOTT STODDARD // Investors Business Daily;7/16/2014, pB11 

    The shareholders of

  • Shareholder franchise--no compromise: Why the Delaware courts must proscribe all managerial... Neuwirth, Morgan N. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Dec96, Vol. 145 Issue 2, p423 

    Argues that courts must not allow managers to purposefully interfere with the shareholder franchise. Need for the courts to carefully scrutinize defensive transactions; Emerging power of the shareholder franchise; Limitations and restrictions on the shareholder franchise; Judicial response to...

  • Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. Dunstan, James // Columbia Journal of World Business;Spring94, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p92 

    Reviews the book "Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization," by Michael Useem.

  • THE MYTH OF THE SHAREHOLDER FRANCHISE. Bebchuk, Lucian A. // Virginia Law Review;May2007, Vol. 93 Issue 3, p675 

    The author discusses several myths related to shareholder franchise. One myth about the subject he presented is the treatment of shareholder franchise as a key mechanism for making boards accountable. He emphasizes that shareholders do not have the powers of corporate democracy. Moreover, he...

  • Shareholder By-Law Amendments and the Poison Pill: The Market for Corporate Control and Economic Efficiency. Garms, R. Matthew // Journal of Corporation Law;Winter99, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p433 

    Examines the corporate shareholders' by-law amendments and the role of poison pill in the historic struggle for corporate control between boards of directors and shareholders. Statutory framework regulating the conflict between shareholder and director power; Arguments for the power of...

  • Shareholder power.  // Essential Director;2003, p172 

    A definition of the term "shareholder power" is presented. It refers to the power of a shareholder to influence board decisions. However, individual shareholders in public companies seldom have real power in corporate governance matters. It is stated that individual investor usually lack the...

  • VOTING POWER AND SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM. STRAND, THERESE; POULSEN, THOMAS; THOMSEN, STEEN // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses the development of a voting power theory that is applied to a unique data set on Swedish shareholder meetings. The authors hypothesize that there is a positive relationship between shareholder activism and the largest shareholder's sensitivity to greater participation by...

  • Who owns the corporation? Cote, Marcel // CA Magazine;Dec2002, Vol. 135 Issue 10, p60 

    Speculates that the shareholders could be the cause of business scandals. Power accorded to shareholders of companies; Challenges faced by management to create value for shareholders; Issue of property rights associated with shares.

  • MESSAGE FROM OUR DG.  // Director;Jun2012, Vol. 65 Issue 10, p68 

    The article discusses the balance of power between shareholders and chief executives with a focus on shareholder activism concerning corporate governance in Great Britain as of June 2012.

  • THE MYTHICAL BENEFITS OF SHAREHOLDER CONTROL. Stout, Lynn A. // Virginia Law Review;May2007, Vol. 93 Issue 3, p789 

    The author comments on the article "The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise," by Lucian Bebchuk. Bebchuk presents a myth regarding the power of shareholders in public corporations like their presumed power to remove directors. He agrees with the argument of Bebchuk on the issue of the powers held...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics