PUSHING CORPORATE BOARDS TO BE BETTER Through proxy fights and lawsuits, newly aggressive shareholders are winning more control of the companies they own. They are forcing directors to shape up and do their jobs

Sherman, Stratford P.; Krusekopf, Charles C.
July 1988
Fortune;7/18/1988, Vol. 118 Issue 2, p58
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • Corporate Voting and the Takeover Debate. Edelman, Paul H.; Thomas, Randall S. // Vanderbilt Law Review;Mar2005, Vol. 58 Issue 2, p453 

    For many years academics have debated whether it is better to permit hostile acquirers to use tender offers to gain control over unwilling target companies, or to force them to use corporate elections of boards of directors in these efforts. The Delaware courts have expressed a strong preference...

  • Anatomy Of A Proxy Fight. Posner, Rachel // Corporate Board;Jul/Aug2014, Vol. 35 Issue 207, p6 

    Proxy season 2014 has seen activist investors pushing hard on issues like strategy, stock buyhacks, board qualifications, and executive pay. While boards and managers are doing more to engage the activists (including of-fers of board seats), the classic proxy fight, pitting the company against...

  • Compensation , proxy access at top of list. Burr, Barry B. // Pensions & Investments;1/10/2005, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p16 

    The article reports that according to institutional investors and consultants, reining in executive compensation, seeking more board accountability, and proxy access that would allow shareholders to nominate directors are likely to be the major issues of the 2005 proxy season. In terms of...

  • Draught, Development, and Discourse: The Northern Ontario Draught Beer Monopoly, 1972-92. White, Daryl // Journal of Canadian Studies;Spring2013, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p5 

    From 1942 to 1992, Northern Ontario's draught beer market was shielded from outside competition. For 30 years, this was done by a gentlemen's agreement among brewers, but in 1972, the Ontario government took the extraordinary step of enforcing a legal monopoly for what was then the only brewer...

  • Corporate Elections and Tactical Settlements. Harris, Lee // Journal of Corporation Law;Winter2014, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p221 

    Once yearly, shareholders get an opportunity to vote on who shall serve on the board of directors. From time to time, these elections for board seats are contested. In a contested election, the incumbent board is exposed to the risk that a challenger might succeed in winning a seat on the board...

  • Hercules Nominates New Directors, Enhances Corporate Governance. Westervelt, Robert // Chemical Week;6/11/2003, Vol. 165 Issue 21, p9 

    Reports on the nomination of three corporate directors by Hercules in June 2003 in response to International Specialty Products' (ISP) planned proxy fight for control of Hercules' board. Percentage of the company owned by ISP; Plans for the enhancement of corporate governance; Information on...

  • Crank or visionary? The man behind the proxy fight at Compass Bancshares. Cline, Kenneth // American Banker;9/2/1995 Supplement, Vol. 160, p7 

    Reports on Compass Bancshares Inc. founder Harry B. Brock Jr.'s fight to gain control of the bank's board through a proxy challenge. Brock's pursuit of the conviction that the company needs to be sold; Formation of a committee with two other Compass directors to wage the proxy fight; Decision...

  • Lionsgate: defensive move in board game. Bond, Paul // Hollywood Reporter Weekend Edition;7/10/2009, Vol. 410 Issue 29, p6 

    The article presents information on the plans of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. to add its biggest shareholder and longtime management ally to its board in a move that would help thwart a feared proxy fight by shareholder Carl Icahn. Mark Rachesky, who owns 19.8% of Lionsgate's stock, will be...

  • The efficient monitoring role of proxy contests: An empirical analysis of post-contest control... Borstadt, Lisa F.; Zwirlein, Thomas J. // FM: The Journal of the Financial Management Association;Fall92, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p22 

    This article focuses on the efficient monitoring role of proxy contests. As a disciplinary mechanism, the proxy contest has been as "somewhere between a board dismissal of management and an outside takeover by another corporation." Even if the dissidents do not win the proxy contest, dissident...

  • HealthSouth settlement could raise the bar for proxy access. Burr, Barry B. // Pensions & Investments;1/12/2004, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p12 

    A settlement between Louisiana Teachers' Retirement System and HealthSouth Corp. might pave the way for more meaningful involvement of shareholders in nominating directors to a corporate board, regardless of the disposition of the Securities and Exchange Commission proposal on shareholder proxy...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics