WHY THROW MONEY AT ASBESTOS? Building owners and taxpayers could spend $100 billion over the next 25 years to scrape the stuff out of buildings. But the cleanup might cost more lives than it saves

Richman, Louis S.; Mendes, Joshua
June 1988
Fortune;6/6/1988, Vol. 117 Issue 12, p155
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • 16 SAUDI NUCLEAR REACTORS TO COST $300 BN.  // Middle East Reporter (Daily Edition);6/1/2011, Vol. 198 Issue 5101, p1 

    The article reports that Saudi Arabia is planning to build 16 nuclear reactors over the next 20 years at a cost of more than 300 billion dollars.

  • Improved energy code has many benefits. Ward, Alecia // Crain's Detroit Business;11/8/2004, Vol. 20 Issue 45, p9 

    This article presents information on new energy code for homes and residential buildings. With analysts expecting energy prices to remain high and volatile for the next several years, improving the state's energy code is an easy, low-cost solution to reduce the amount of money consumers must...

  • Friend or foe, a real estate problem revisited. Welsh, Thomas N. // Fort Worth Business Press;3/15/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 11, p3 

    Discusses the problems created by the use of asbestos in buildings. Concerns of building owners over possible passage of a law that will require the removal of asbestos material from existing buildings; Health impacts of asbestos inhalation; Emergence of specialists offering clean-up services...

  • NAO says Northern Ireland 'could do more' to save money.  // Public Private Finance;Apr2005, Issue 92, p10 

    The article discusses improvements to the way Northern Ireland government departments manage their building projects that could deliver savings of £300m over three years. In addition, some £50m a year might be saved, if the Office of Government Commerce's gateway review process were...

  • Rx for Medicaid: HMOs? Stainburn, Samantha // Crain's Chicago Business;9/26/2005, Vol. 28 Issue 39, p18 

    Presents an interview with Joel Menges, vice-president of Falls Church, Virginia-based Lewin Group, about his claim that switching to an HMO-only Medicaid program could save Illinois $1.5 billion over five years. Discussion on the issue of reducing Medicaid spending without cutting benefits to...

  • Behind the Story: Orange County Register reporter stays patient and follows the money trail. HARKINS, SARAH // IRE Journal;Spring2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p34 

    The article discusses how Melody Petersen of "The Orange County Register" practiced patience and followed the money trail to investigate the school bonds in Orange County. Peterson found out that the schools were opting for expensive deals that would cost taxpayers more than 10 times the...

  • Foreign Affairs: Effective Stewardship of Resources Essential to Efficient Operations at State Department, USAID: GAO-03-1009T. Ford, Jess T. // GAO Reports;9/4/2003, p1 

    In recent years, funding for the Department of State has increased dramatically, particularly for security upgrades at overseas facilities and a major hiring program. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has also received more funds, especially for programs in Afghanistan and...

  • £180,000 a year for the boss of a quango that has yet to carry out a single project. Michael Tait // Mail on Sunday;1/3/2010, p9 

    A PUBLIC body created to build schools and hospitals spends more than £1 million of taxpayers' money a year on just 12 staff - but has yet to lay a brick.

  • County can have BofA building.  // Inside Tucson Business;11/27/2006, Vol. 16 Issue 24, p4 

    The article presents the author's views regarding the approved spending by the Board of Supervisors of $24.1 million to buy the 22-story Bank of America building in Pima County, Arizona from Colton Co. Many believes that within 10 years the whole building will be filled with bureaucrats leaving...

  • COMMENT ON NEW FEDERAL SPENDING. Griffith, Corinne // Congressional Digest;Feb58, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p62 

    This article presents author's views on abolishing the individual income tax in the United States. The author feels that the Federal Government is spending money on defense at the expense of denying development in business and other areas. The Federal Government is losing a staggering sum of 29...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics