Group interventions to improve health outcomes: a framework for their design and delivery

Hoddinott, ,2Pat; Allan, Karen; Avenell, Alison; Britten, Jane
January 2010
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p800
Academic Journal
Background: Delivering an intervention to a group of patients to improve health outcomes is increasingly popular in public health and primary care, yet "group" is an umbrella term which encompasses a complex range of aims, theories, implementation processes and evaluation methods. We propose a framework for the design and process evaluation of health improvement interventions occurring in a group setting, which will assist practitioners, researchers and policy makers. Methods: We reviewed the wider literature on health improvement interventions delivered to patient groups and identified a gap in the literature for designing, evaluating and reporting these interventions. We drew on our experiences conducting systematic reviews, intervention, mixed method and ethnographic studies of groups for breastfeeding and weight management. A framework for health improvement group design and delivery evolved through an iterative process of primary research, reference to the literature and research team discussion. Results: Although there is an extensive literature on group processes in education, work, politics and psychological therapies, far less is known about groups where the aim is health improvement. Theories of behaviour change which are validated for individual use are often assumed to be generalisable to group settings, without being rigorously tested. Health improvement or behaviour change interventions delivered in a group setting are complex adaptive social processes with interactions between the group leader, participants, and the wider community and environment. Ecological models of health improvement, which embrace the complex relationship between behaviour, systems and the environment may be more relevant than an individual approach to behaviour change. Conclusion: The evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group compared with one-to-one interventions for many areas of health improvement in public health and primary care is weak or unknown. Our proposed framework is the first step towards advocating a more systematic approach to designing, evaluating and reporting interventions in group settings, which is necessary to improve this currently weak evidence base. This framework will enable policy makers and practitioners to be better informed about what works, how it works and in which contexts when aiming to improve health in a group setting.


Related Articles

  • The impact of walk in centres.  // Primary Health Care;May2007, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p6 

    The article focuses on the contribution of walk in centers (WIC) on the shorter waiting times to see a general practitioner (GP) in practices near the WIC in Great Britain. Data from the national monthly primary care access survey of wafting time to next available GP appointment statistically...

  • Ministers wrest control of private contracts from PCTs. Cameron, Ian // Pulse;6/29/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 26, p10 

    The article reports on the take-over of Department of Health from Primary Care Trusts (PCT) on the procurement of alternative providers of general practitioners (GP) services in Great Britain. The move was made as a result of growing frustration at the length of time taken by PCT's, that brings...

  • Briefly.  // Health Management Technology;Sep2006, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p10 

    The article presents news briefs related to health management technology. Pro-Health Physicians, a large practice group of primary care doctors based in Farmington, Connecticut is opening retail-based clinics under the name MedAccess in Price Chopper supermarkets in the state. In a recent...

  • Flawed data hands Darzi centres to wrong PCT. Elledge, Jonn // GP: General Practitioner;9/12/2008, p3 

    The article rapports on the creation of two new Alternative Provider Medical Services (APMS)practices in North East England by the Primary Care Trust (PCT) due to PCT's miscalculation on the number of practice nurses working on their patch. The decision of APMS establishment was in lieu of the...

  • The new GMS challenge starts now. Lawrence-Parr, Carole // Medeconomics;Apr2004, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p16 

    Those people working in PCTs and implementing the new GP contract will no doubt have found their work over the past few months challenging, to say the least. It dominates the working day-such is the magnitude of the change to the way in which primary care services will now be delivered...

  • Five years from now... Lewis, Carol // Medeconomics;Dec2003, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p24 

    The article predicts future trends for general practitioners (GPs). The past five years have seen some of the biggest changes in the history of primary care. There will be more women GPs than men in post. About one-third of GPs will be salaried and they will mainly be employed by primary care...

  • Primary care residency training: the first five years. Boufford, Jo Ivey; Boufford, J I // Annals of Internal Medicine;Sep77, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p359 

    The training of physicians for the delivery of primary care is becoming a national priority. The period of residency training is viewed by many as the focal point for educational change to meet this demand. The Residency Program in Social Medicine at Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center was...

  • Tariff is still not working properly.  // Pulse;11/30/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 45, p9 

    The article reports on the impact of tariff on the medical services offered by health facilities in Great Britain. According to health secretary Patricia Hewitt, general practitioners were aware of the effect of tariff on hospital procedures. The payment of government tax would disrupt the...

  • Forging links:evolving attitudes of clinical governance leads in general practice. Meal, Andy; Wynn, Alison; Pringle, Mike; Cater, Ruth; Hippisley-Cox, Julia // Quality in Primary Care;2004, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p59 

    Background Clinical governance was introduced by the British government in 1998 at the same time as the creation, in England, of organisations to deliver it in primary care - primary care groups. It was acknowledged, however, that individual general practices and primary care teams would...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics