EPA proposes to withdraw use of pesticide sulfuryl fluoride on food

January 2011
Southwest Farm Press;1/20/2011, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p14
Trade Publication
The article reports on the proposal from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw the use of pesticide sulfuryl fluoride in food in the U.S.


Related Articles

  • It's not easy to sell ""safe" products Susca, Paul // In Business;Jan/Feb1990, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p34 

    No abstract available.

  • While EPA hems, organic food industry soars.  // In Business;Jan/Feb99, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p8 

    Reports on the stand of the United States Environmental Protection Agency on pesticides on food. Health effects of pesticides; Contents of a brochure on the issue.

  • EPA seeks comments on public involvement in pesticide risk reduction decisions.  // Journal of Environmental Health;Oct1994, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p35 

    Announces the Environmental Protection Agency's acceptance of comments and suggestions concerning the way to involve the public regarding significant risk reduction measures on registered pesticides. Contact information.

  • Why not bug spray cans that talk, asks EPA.  // Packaging Digest;Feb97, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p8 

    Reports that the US Environmental Protection Agency is researching the prospect for audible consumer warnings on packages of commercial pesticide, herbicide and other products. Possibility that an audio chip be embedded into a paperboard package; Process of soliciting volunteers within targeted...

  • Particle beam liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of National Pesticide Survey analytes Miles, Carl J.; Bajic, Steve; Doerge, Daniel R. // Archives of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology;Feb1992, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p247 

    No abstract available.

  • The Proposed FIFRA Amendments of 1977: Untangling the Knot of Pesticide Registration Schulberg, Francine // Harvard Environmental Law Review;1977, Vol. 2, p342 

    No abstract available.

  • Joint announcement about emergency pesticide use.  // FDA Consumer;Sep93, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p4 

    Informs that the US Environmental Protection Agency will no longer allow emergency use of pesticides on crops if the pesticide poses any cancer risk to animals or humans and may concentrate in processed foods. Case of `Lee v. Reilly' and its impact; The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and...

  • NCAMP blasts EPA.  // Pest Control;Feb96, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p84 

    Reports on the National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides' (NCAMP) criticism of the Environmental Protection Agency's decision to join forces with other groups to distribute information packets about integrated pest management in public school districts. Details of fundraising letter...

  • Environmental Pesticide Illness and Injury The Need for a National Surveillance System. Blindauer,, Kim M.; Jackson,, Richard J.; McGeehin, Michael; Pertowski,, Carol; Rubin, Carol // Journal of Environmental Health;Jun1999, Vol. 61 Issue 10, p9 

    Provides information on the United States National Center for Environmental Health and the Environmental Protection Agency's surveillance project to monitor pesticide-related health conditions resulting from nonoccupational pesticide exposures. Background of pesticides; Public health benefits of...

  • EPA gets better data.  // Chemical Week;4/24/1996, Vol. 158 Issue 16, p32 

    Reports on the reduction of the rejection rate for pesticide industry studies submitted in support of pesticide regulations in the United States according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Factors attributable to improved study quality.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics