Assessment of core capacities for the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]) - Uganda, 2009

Wamala, Joseph F.; Okot, Charles; Makumbi, Issa; Natseri, Nasan; Kisakye, Annet; Nanyunja2,, Miriam; Bakamutumaho, Barnabas; Lutwama, Julius J.; Sreedharan, Rajesh; Jun Xing; Gaturuku, Peter; Aisu, Thomas; Da Silveira, Fernando; Chungong, Stella
January 2010
BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1
Academic Journal
Background Uganda is currently implementing the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]) within the context of Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR). The IHR(2005) require countries to assess the ability of their national structures, capacities, and resources to meet the minimum requirements for surveillance and response. This report describes the results of the assessment undertaken in Uganda. Methods We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional assessment using the protocol developed by the World Health Organisation (WHO). The data collection tools were adapted locally and administered to a convenience sample of IHR(2005) stakeholders, and frequency analyses were performed. Results Ugandan national laws relevant to the IHR(2005) existed, but they did not adequately support the full implementation of the IHR(2005). Correspondingly, there was a designated IHR National Focal Point (NFP), but surveillance activities and operational communications were limited to the health sector. All the districts (13/13) had designated disease surveillance offices, most had IDSR technical guidelines (92%, or 12/13), and all (13/13) had case definitions for infectious and zoonotic diseases surveillance. Surveillance guidelines were available at 57% (35/61) of the health facilities, while case definitions were available at 66% (40/61) of the health facilities. The priority diseases list, surveillance guidelines, case definitions and reporting tools were based on the IDSR strategy and hence lacked information on the IHR(2005). The rapid response teams at national and district levels lacked food safety, chemical and radio-nuclear experts. Similarly, there were no guidelines on the outbreak response to food, chemical and radio-nuclear hazards. Comprehensive preparedness plans incorporating IHR(2005) were lacking at national and district levels. A national laboratory policy existed and the strategic plan was being drafted. However, there were critical gaps hampering the efficient functioning of the national laboratory network. Finally, the points of entry for IHR(2005) implementation had not been designated. Conclusions The assessment highlighted critical gaps to guide the IHR(2005) planning process. The IHR(2005) action plan should therefore be developed to foster national and international public health security.


Related Articles

  • ASM LabCap's contributions to disease surveillance and the International Health Regulations (2005). Specter, Steven; Schuermann, Lily; Hakiruwizera, Celestin; Keita Sow, Mah-Séré // BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1 

    The revised International Health Regulations [IHR(2005)], which requires the Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop core capacities to detect, assess, report, and respond to public health threats, is bringing new challenges for national and international surveillance...

  • Information and communication technology in disease surveillance, India: a case study. Kant, Lalit; Krishnan, Sampath K. // BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1 

    India has made appreciable progress and continues to demonstrate a strong commitment for establishing and operating a disease surveillance programme responsive to the requirements of the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]). Within five years of its launch, India has effectively used...

  • Laboratory capacity building for the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]) in resource-poor countries: the experience of the African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET). Masanza, Monica Musenero; Nqobile, Ndlovu; Mukanga, David; Gitta, Sheba Nakacubo // BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1 

    Laboratory is one of the core capacities that countries must develop for the implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR[2005]) since laboratory services play a major role in all the key processes of detection, assessment, response, notification, and monitoring of events. While...

  • International Health Regulations (2005) and the U.S. Department of Defense: building core capacities on a foundation of partnership and trust. Johns, Matthew C.; Blazes, David L. // BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1 

    A cornerstone of effective global health surveillance programs is the ability to build systems that identify, track and respond to public health threats in a timely manner. These functions are often difficult and require international cooperation given the rapidity with which diseases cross...

  • Global health security and the International Health Regulations. Andrus, Jon Kim; Aguilera, Ximena; Oliva, Otavio; Aldighieri, Sylvain // BMC Public Health;Jan2010 Supplement 1, Vol. 10, p1 

    Global nuclear proliferation, bioterrorism, and emerging infections have challenged national capacities to achieve and maintain global security. Over the last century, emerging infectious disease threats resulted in the development of the preliminary versions of the International Health...

  • US Implements New International Health Regulations.  // Professional Safety;Oct2007, Vol. 52 Issue 10, p6 

    The article reports that the U.S., along with other member states of the World Health Organization (WHO), has recently enforced the revised International Health Regulations (IHR). WHO states that countries have two years to assess their capacity and develop national action plans for possible...

  • Development a Comprehensive Food Safety System in Serbia- A Narrative Review Article. RADOVIĆ, Vesela; KEKOVIĆ, Zoran; AGIĆ, Samir // Iranian Journal of Public Health;Jul2014, Vol. 43 Issue 7, p889 

    Background: Food safety issues are not a new issue in science, but due to the dynamic changes in the modern world it is as equally important as decades ago. The aim of the study was to address the efforts in the development of a comprehensive food safety system in Serbia, and make specific...

  • Capacity-building efforts by the AFHSC-GEIS program. Sanchez, Jose L.; Johns, Matthew C.; Burke, Ronald L.; Vest, Kelly G.; Fukuda, Mark M.; In-Kyu Yoon; Lon, Chanthap; Quintana, Miguel; Schnabel, David C.; Pimentel, Guillermo; Mansour, Moustafa; Tobias, Steven; Montgomery, Joel M.; Gray, Gregory C.; Saylors, Karen; Ndip, Lucy M.; Lewis, Sheri; Blair, Patrick J.; Sjoberg, Paul A.; Kuschner, Robert A. // BMC Public Health;2011 Supplement 2, Vol. 11 Issue Suppl 2, p1 

    Capacity-building initiatives related to public health are defined as developing laboratory infrastructure, strengthening host-country disease surveillance initiatives, transferring technical expertise and training personnel. These initiatives represented a major piece of the Armed Forces Health...

  • INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS.  // Weekly Epidemiological Record;9/15/2006, Vol. 81 Issue 37, p356 

    A table is presented that lists notifications of cholera in Ghana, Guinea, and Liberia in Africa, which were received from September 8 to 14, 2006 by the International Health Regulations.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics