TITLE

'Brand X' Case Was So 2004: FCC's Schlick Backs New Views On Cable-Modem Regulations

AUTHOR(S)
Eggerton, John; Gibbons, Kent
PUB. DATE
May 2010
SOURCE
Multichannel News;5/31/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 22, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents the view of Austin Schlick, the general counsel at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), on the cable-modem regulations applied on the Brand X case decided upon the U.S. Supreme Court. Together with Paul Clement, Schlick mentions the consistency of a single, integrated information service to the understanding of the Communications Act in the country. He also argues on the bifurcation of the broadband service.
ACCESSION #
57197399

 

Related Articles

  • Does the Internet Need a Beat Cop? EGGERTON, JOHN // Multichannel News;5/31/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 22, p8 

    The article focuses on the plan of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reclassify broadband service through the control the control of Internet Access which the U.S. Congress had warned about. With this, the House Democrats and the Republicans announced that there will be plans to...

  • COMING TO TERMS WITH TITLE II. EGGERTON, JOHN // Multichannel News;5/17/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 20, p3 

    The article offers information on the Cable Show 2010 meeting related to the reclassification of high-speed Internet service under Title II regulations, held in Los Angeles, California. U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Julius Genachowski and general counsel Austin Schlick...

  • Broadband Access: Power Line Potential. Wallace, Bob // Telecommunications - Americas Edition;Mar2005, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p12 

    Discusses the growth of broadband over private power lines (BPL) market through digital subscriber lines and cable modem services. Customer base penetration of electric companies; Description of BPL as the delivery of broadband bandwidth to homes over power lines; Efforts of the U.S. Federal...

  • Court muddies the broadband debate. Levine, Shira // America's Network;11/1/2003, Vol. 107 Issue 16, p14 

    Comments on the rejection of the proposed cable modem rules of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by 9th Circuit U.S. Appeals in San Francisco, California. Classification of the cable modem service as a telecommunication service; Issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking on DSL...

  • AERCO Broadcasting to forfeit $10,000 for unauthorized STL operation.  // Broadcast Engineering Exclusive Insight;8/2/2012, p8 

    The article reports that AERCO Broadcasting has been ordered by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) through a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, to pay the FCC 10,000 U.S. dollars, for operating a studio-to-transmitter link (STL) without FCC authorization. AERCO was also...

  • Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority. Dortch, Marlene H. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;02/14/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 30, p8255 

    The article presents information on a notice issued by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting comments on the information collection requirements (ICRs) related to various FCC's information collection activities including quality and clarity of information and use of...

  • Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2012. Todd, Sheryl D. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;8/3/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 150, p46307 

    The article reports on the final rule issued by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to revise its Schedule of Regulatory Fees. It explains that FCC is required to recover an amount of $339,844,000 that Congress has required the Commission to collect for fiscal year 2012. It notes...

  • Only Title II will ensure fairness among ISPs. van Schewick, Barbara // Hill;9/16/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 97, p20 

    The article offers the author's insights on the adoption of network neutrality rules under Title II of the U.S. Communications Act by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ensure market fairness among Internet service providers (ISPs) in the U.S.

  • Rules and Regulations: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;5/22/2013, Vol. 78 Issue 99, p30226 

    The article announces the final rule on accessibility requirements for internet browsers published by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. The commission adopts rules to enforce section 718 of the Communications Act of 1934 which was included to the Act by the Twenty-First Century...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics