Referee acknowledgment for 2010

Davidson, Ronald C.
December 2010
Physics of Plasmas;Dec2010, Vol. 17 Issue 12, p129801
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • From the Editors. Faulkingham, Ralph; Fratkin, Elliot; Goheen, Mitzi; Redding, Sean // African Studies Review;Dec2010, Vol. 53 Issue 3, preceding p1 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editors discuss the ways on how they handle the review process for manuscripts submitted for publication.

  • Publication ethics and malpractice statement "Archives of Pharmacy Practice". Khan, Tahir M. // Archives of Pharmacy Practice;Jan-Mar2014, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p1 

    The author presents information on the publication ethics outlined by the Archives of Pharmacy Practice (APP). The three common unethical conducts being committed are dual publication, an article accepted in APP, but is in peer review in another periodical or in consideration for publication in...

  • Should multiple submissions become the norm in journals? Kumar, Malhar N. // Learned Publishing;Jul2014, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p167 

    The author expresses his views on multiple submissions for journals. Multiple submissions refer to simultaneous submission of the same manuscript by the same authors to two or more journals. According to the author, multiple submissions are not unethical because authors declare in writing that...

  • Reviewing refereeing.  // Nature Cell Biology;Feb2011, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p109 

    The author reflects on the importance of high quality refereeing for a robust peer review process. The author highlights the central elements of the ideal referee report. Moreover, the author states that an ideal report must offer an objective and thorough evaluation of the potential impact of...

  • THE EDITOR. Shortell, Cynthia // Journal of Surgical Radiology;Jul2011, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p214 

    The author reflects on the history, present and future of the "Journal of Surgical Radiology" with the vision of creating an entirely new educational platform that would enable to unite the traditional components of the academic peer review process. She expresses her gratitude to the members of...

  • What are the Characteristics of a Manuscript Acceptable for Publication? Denial, Aurora // Optometric Education;Summer2014, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p98 

    The author offers guidelines on writing acceptable manuscripts on optometry for publication. Topics discussed include the peer review process, factors that influence the acceptance/rejection rates, deciding where to publish and the likelihood for success requires understanding a journal's...

  • Philosophy Journal Practices and Opportunities for Bias. Lee, Carole J.; Schunn, Christian D. // APA Newsletters;Fall2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, Special section p5 

    The article focuses on a 2009 survey of philosophy journal practices in undertaking a research project on evaluation processes and bias in knowledge communities. A list of general philosophy journals that participated in the survey is provided including the "American Philosophical Quarterly."...

  • Rewarding reviewers - sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained. Warne, Verity // Learned Publishing;Jan2016, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p41 

    In July 2015, Wiley surveyed over 170,000 researchers in order to explore peer reviewing experience; attitudes towards recognition and reward for reviewers; and training requirements. The survey received 2,982 usable responses (a response rate of 1.7%). Respondents from all markets indicated...

  • A valued service.  // Library Journal;10/1/2016, Vol. 141 Issue 16, p12 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Sci-Hub Controversy Triggers Publishers' Critique of Librarian" by Lisa Peet which appears in a previous issue of the journal and addresses the roles of publishers and the costs associated with the research paper peer review process.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics