TITLE

Transition between neo-Darwinian and non-Darwinian evolution

AUTHOR(S)
Matsuda, Hirotsugu
PUB. DATE
June 2000
SOURCE
AIP Conference Proceedings;2000, Vol. 519 Issue 1, p772
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Controversies have continued as to the range of applicability of neoDarwinian and non-Darwinian view of evolution, since Kimura proposed the neutral theory of molecular evolution. By the former view evolution rate v is regulated by environment independent of mutation rate m, whereas by the latter view it is regulated by mutation independent of environment change rate. To understand the population genetical conditions for demarcating the two views, inducibility &χ = δv/δμ of evolution rate is studied for simple dynamical model and Markovian model. For neo-Darwinian evolution the inducibility is almost 0, whereas for non-Darwinian evolution it is significantly positive. Among non-Darwinian evolution, the inducibility is nearly equal to 1 for neutral evolution. The critical selection intensity Sc demarcating neo-Darwinian and non-Darwinian evolution is obtained. There exists another demarcation selection intensity Sc‾ such that in the range (Sc‾ Sc) the evolution is non-Darwinian but not neutral. This transition region corresponds to Ohta's nearly neutral evolution. Estimating its relative width s[sub c]‾/s[sub c], it is argued that so long as the effect of selection is significant for polymorphism, neo-Darwinian evolution will be more frequent in nature \than the nearly neutral evolution.
ACCESSION #
5664941

 

Related Articles

  • how fast is evolution? Lambert, David // New Zealand Science Teacher;2007, Issue 116, p14 

    The article discusses the relationship between the rate of mutation and the rate of evolution. According to the author, evolution is the changes in the composition of populations. He states that the speed of evolution is determined by how fast the natural selection could act to change the...

  • Instant Update: Considering the Molecular Mechanisms of Mutation & Natural Selection. HUBLER, TINA; ADAMS, PATTI; SCAMMELL, JONATHAN // American Biology Teacher (University of California Press);Jan2015, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p6 

    The molecular basis of evolution is an important concept to understand but one that students and teachers often find challenging. This article provides training and guidance for teachers on how to present molecular evolution concepts so that students will associate molecular changes with the...

  • Molecular Clock: An Anti-neo-Darwinian Legacy. Takahata, Naoyuki // Genetics;May2007, Vol. 176 Issue 1, p1 

    The article comments on several views about the concept of a molecular protein clock. According to the author, the views are different with respect to genetic material, rate and pattern of mutation and roles of natural selection that are invoked in phenotypic evolution. He adds the mutation...

  • Molecular Evolution of New Species without Modern Synthetic Theory (neo-Darwinism). Ahad, Md. Abdul // International Journal of Bio-Resource & Stress Management;Jun2011, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p131 

    The modern synthetic theory (neo-Darwinism) is an extension of Darwinian Theory of evolution. It is a combination of mutations and natural selection. Both Darwinian and synthetic theory are based on mutation and population genetics. This theory is accepted by the most biologists. It advocates...

  • Interaction-based evolution: how natural selection and nonrandom mutation work together. Livnat, Adi // Biology Direct;2013, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p2 

    Background The modern evolutionary synthesis leaves unresolved some of the most fundamental, long-standing questions in evolutionary biology: What is the role of sex in evolution? How does complex adaptation evolve? How can selection operate effectively on genetic interactions? More recently,...

  • Molecular evolution and positive Darwinian selection of the chloroplast maturase matK. Da Cheng Hao; Shi Lin Chen; Pei Gen Xiao // Journal of Plant Research;Mar2010, Vol. 123 Issue 2, p241 

    It is not clear whether matK evolves under Darwinian selection. In this study, 70 plant groups, representing 2,279 species at various evolutionary levels, were used to illustrate the molecular adaptation and evolutionary dynamics of gene divergence in matKs. Selective influences were...

  • Towards a Definition of Life: The Impossible Quest? Lazcano, Antonio // Space Science Reviews;Mar2008, Vol. 135 Issue 1-4, p5 

    “Life” is an empirical concept whose various definitions and phenomenological characterizations depend on historical frameworks. Although analysis of existing literature suggests that attempts to define life will remain, at best, a work in progress, the history of biology shows that...

  • Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Chamary, J. V.; Parmley, Joanna L.; Hurst, Laurence D. // Nature Reviews Genetics;Feb2006, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p98 

    Although the assumption of the neutral theory of molecular evolution — that some classes of mutation have too small an effect on fitness to be affected by natural selection — seems intuitively reasonable, over the past few decades the theory has been in retreat. At least in species...

  • Epigenetics and the Evolution of Darwin’s Finches. Skinner, Michael K.; Gurerrero-Bosagna, Carlos; Haque, M. Muksitul; Nilsson, Eric E.; Koop, Jennifer A.H.; Knutie, Sarah A.; Clayton, Dale H. // Genome Biology & Evolution;Jul2014, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p1972 

    The prevailing theory for the molecular basis of evolution involves genetic mutations that ultimately generate the heritable phenotypic variation on which natural selection acts. However, epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of phenotypic variation may also play an important role in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics