Variation in the Detection of Serrated Polyps in an Average Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Cohort

Hetzel, Jeremy T.; Huang, Christopher S.; Coukos, Jennifer A.; Omstead, Kelsey; Cerda, Sandra R.; Yang, Shi; O'Brien, Michael J.; Farraye, Francis A.
December 2010
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2010, Vol. 105 Issue 12, p2656
Academic Journal
OBJECTIVES:Serrated polyps are precursors in an alternative pathway to colon cancer. These polyps are frequently sessile or flat, located in the proximal colon, and may be overlooked during colonoscopy. Histological criteria to classify these polyps have only recently been described. This study assessed the variation of serrated polyp detection among endoscopists and pathologists in an average risk-screening cohort and trends in detection over time.METHODS:Endoscopy and pathology reports were reviewed from all average risk-screening colonoscopies at an urban academic medical center from 2006 through 2008. Polyps were classified as adenoma (tubular, tubulovillous, or villous), serrated polyp (hyperplastic polyp (HP), sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), or dysplastic serrated polyp (DSP)), adenocarcinoma, or other. Differences in polyp detection among endoscopists and pathologists were tested with χ2-tests. Potential predictors of polyp detection were modeled with Poisson regression.RESULTS:Included in the study were 4,335 polyps from 7,192 colonoscopies. Detection prevalence (patients with at least one polyp per 100 colonoscopies) was 22.2 for adenomas, 11.7 for HP, 0.6 for SSA, and 0.2 for DSP. Detection prevalence of proximal SSAs increased from 0.2 in 2006 to 4.4 in 2008 (P<0.001). Detection prevalences among endoscopists differed significantly for adenomas, HP, and SSA. Classification rates among pathologists differed significantly for HP and SSA, but not for adenoma or DSP. On multivariate analysis, endoscopist was a significant predictor of adenoma, HP, and SSA. Pathologist was a significant predictor of HP, SSA, and DSP, but not adenoma.CONCLUSIONS:This study describes the detection of colorectal polyps in an average risk-screening cohort at an urban academic medical center. Detection of proximal SSAs increased during the study period. Detection of adenoma, HP, and SSA differed significantly by endoscopist. Classification of HP and SSA differed significantly by pathologist. Endoscopy and pathology practices should consider educational interventions to improve serrated polyp detection and standardize classification.


Related Articles

  • Risk of colon cancer after computed tomography-diagnosed acute diverticulitis: is routine colonoscopy necessary? Sallinen, Ville; Mentula, Panu; Leppäniemi, Ari // Surgical Endoscopy;Mar2014, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p961 

    Background: Current guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing diverticulitis and for routine follow-up colonoscopy to rule out cancer. Scientific data to support routine colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis are scarce and conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of...

  • Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend? Nakao, Steven; Fassler, Steven; Sucandy, Iswanto; Kim, Soo; Zebley, D. // Surgical Endoscopy;Mar2013, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p768 

    Background: Despite the high sensitivity of screening colonoscopy, polyps and cancers can still go undetected. With the polyp-to-cancer transformation cycle averaging 7-10 years, present guidelines recommend repeat colonoscopy within 10 years after negative screening. However, not all colorectal...

  • Worrisome polyps in the family. Brink, Susan; Saltzman, Amy // U.S. News & World Report;1/22/96, Vol. 120 Issue 3, p66 

    Reports that a study in the `New England Journal of Medicine' concluded that benign polyps in the large intestine can increase the chance of contracting colorectal cancer. American Cancer Society recommendation that people with relatives with colorectal cancer should be screened.

  • When should I be evaluated for colon cancer?  // Tennessee Tribune;1/13/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 2/3, p6B 

    The article offers information on the risk factors of colon cancer.

  • Circulating Vitamin D and Colorectal Adenoma in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Individuals Who Underwent First Screening Colonoscopy: A Case-Control Study. Hong, Sung; Kim, Jeong; Choe, Won; Lee, Sun-Young; Seol, Dong; Moon, Hee-Won; Hur, Mina; Yun, Yeo-Min; Sung, In; Park, Hyung; Shim, Chan // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Mar2012, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p753 

    Background: A higher circulating vitamin D level is inversely associated with the risk of colorectal cancer, but the association with adenoma risk is less clear. Aims: We examined the association between the circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and colorectal adenoma in...

  • Association of Gallbladder Polyp with the Risk of Colorectal Adenoma. Jung Won Jeun; Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jun Uk Lim // Intestinal Research;2014, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p48 

    Background/Aims: Gallbladder polyps and colorectal adenomas share many common risk factors; however, their association has never been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate this association in asymptomatic healthy subjects. Methods: Consecutive asymptomatic subjects who underwent both...

  • Queue Position in the Endoscopic Schedule Impacts Effectiveness of Colonoscopy. Lee, Alexander; Iskander, John M.; Gupta, Nitin; Borg, Brian B.; Zuckerman, Gary; Banerjee, Bhaskar; Gyawali, C Prakash // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Aug2011, Vol. 106 Issue 8, p1457 

    OBJECTIVES:Endoscopist fatigue potentially impacts colonoscopy. Fatigue is difficult to quantitate, but polyp detection rates between non-fatigued and fatigued time periods could represent a surrogate marker. We assessed whether timing variables impacted polyp detection rates at a busy tertiary...

  • Lifestyle as a predictor for colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals. Larsen, Inger K.; Grotmol, Tom; Almendingen, Kari; Hoff, Geir // BMC Gastroenterology;2006, Vol. 6, p5 

    Background: Lifestyle is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) and is also found to be associated with occurrence of adenomas. In the present study we evaluated risk factors for both low-risk adenomas and advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals using a singlepaged...

  • A Comparison of Optical Colonoscopy and CT Colonography Screening Strategies in the Detection and Recovery of Subcentimeter Adenomas. Benson, Mark; Dureja, Parul; Gopal, Deepak; Reichelderfer, Mark; Pfau, Patrick R. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2010, Vol. 105 Issue 12, p2578 

    OBJECTIVES:Evidence has shown that computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC) can detect advanced adenomas at an equal rate; however, a comparison of the subcentimeter adenoma detection has not been performed. The objective of this study is to compare CTC and OC...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics