Obesity prevention and personal responsibility: the case of front-of-pack food labelling in Australia

Magnusson, Roger S.
January 2010
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p662
Academic Journal
Background: In Australia, the food industry and public health groups are locked in serious struggle for regulatory influence over the terms of front-of-pack food labelling. Clear, unambiguous labelling of the nutritional content of pre-packaged foods and of standardized food items sold in chain restaurants is consistent with the prevailing philosophy of 'personal responsibility'. An interpretive, front-of-pack labelling scheme has the capacity to encourage healthier patterns of eating, and to be a catalyst for improvements in the nutritional quality of food products through re-formulation. On the other hand, the strength of opposition of the Australian Food and Grocery Council to 'Traffic Light Labelling', and its efforts to promote a non-interpretive, voluntary scheme, invite the interpretation that the food industry is resistant to any reforms that could destabilise current (unhealthy) purchasing patterns and the revenues they represent. Discussion: This article argues that although policies that aim to educate consumers about the nutritional content of food are welcome, they are only one part of a broader basket of policies that are needed to make progress on obesity prevention and public health nutrition. However, to the extent that food labelling has the capacity to inform and empower consumers to make healthier choices - and to be a catalyst for improving the nutritional quality of commercial recipes - it has an important role to play. Furthermore, given the dietary impact of meals eaten in fast food and franchise restaurants, interpretive labelling requirements should not be restricted to prepackaged foods. Summary: Food industry resistance to an interpretive food labelling scheme is an important test for government, and a case study of how self-interest prompts industry to promote weaker, voluntary schemes that pre-empt and undermine progressive public health regulation.


Related Articles

  • Industry welcomes Conservative Party's proposals to battle obesity.  // Food Manufacture;Sep2008, Vol. 83 Issue 9, p5 

    The article reports on the support of the food industry to the proposal for a future Conservative government to forge a non-bureaucratic partnership with processors in a bid to tackle concerns over obesity in Great Britain. According to the Food and Drink Federation (FDF), Andrew Lansley's...

  • Front-of-Pack labeling.  // Oregon Wheat;Apr2009, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p17 

    The article offers information on Smart Choices program (SCP) which is intended to help consumers stay within their daily caloric requirements. It notes that the said program was developed by leading food companies, public health and other nutritional organizations. It is also intended to bring...

  • Some food labels still may be erroneous. The Associated Press // Marketing News;9/24/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 20, p52 

    The article reports on results of tests conducted by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and obtained by the "South Florida Sun-Sentinel" newspaper showing several items with inaccurate food labels. It claims that three out of four diet products tested by the department...

  • food labels: what do they mean? Thompson, Sue // Australian Parents;Apr/May2003, p58 

    Focuses on the changes on to labelling on food packages in Australia, as of June 2003. Explanation on the nutrition information panel; Nutrients that may be listed; Information on the ingredient list.

  • What the marks mean...  // Checkout;Sep2009, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p22 

    The article offers information on different marks on consumer goods in Ireland. The Love Irish Food mark applies to branded and packaged good and drink products and products with 80% added value in the Republic of Ireland. Bord Bia Quality Mark can be seen on meat, eggs and vegetables and only...

  • Health Star Rating food labelling scheme gets the go-ahead. CARTWRIGHT, ANGELA // Choice;Aug2014, p5 

    The article reports on the Health Star Rating food labelling scheme that has been approved by the federal, state and territory government food health ministers of Australia.

  • FRONT-OF-PACK INFO COMING, MANDATE OR NOT.  // Food & Beverage Packaging;Mar2011, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p12 

    The article reports on the move of food and beverage industry to put nutritional information on the fronts of their packages in the U.S.

  • Labelling, obesity and the Titanic's deckchairs.  // Food Manufacture;Dec2012, Vol. 87 Issue 12, p12 

    The article discusses issues related to food labeling in Great Britain. The author believes that traffic light labels on composite foods and ready meals is beneficial where information is not otherwise easy to gauge and compare. It is informed that supermarkets should have one huge red traffic...

  • Post Nestle's Maggi fiasco, food cos like PepsiCo, Parle, Yum! Brands play safe; highlight safety aspect.  // FRPT- FMCG Snapshot;6/7/2015, p15 

    The article reports on the move of local food companies in India to limit any collateral damage by declaring more ingredient details on packaging, highlighting product safety in advertisement and increasing engagement with consumers through social media following the Nestle's Maggi noodles fiasco.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics