TITLE

Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

AUTHOR(S)
Yabuuchi, Hidetake; Matsuo, Yoshio; Sunami, Shunya; Kamitani, Takeshi; Kawanami^1, Satoshi; Setoguchi, Taro; Sakai, Shuji; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu; Kubo, Makoto; Tokunaga, Eriko; Yamamoto, Hidetaka; Honda, Hiroshi
PUB. DATE
January 2011
SOURCE
European Radiology;Jan2011, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the detectability of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using mammography (MMG), dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) and unenhanced MR imaging with combined diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images (DWI + T2WI). Methods: Forty-two lesions in 42 patients with non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women were enrolled. For the reading test, we prepared a control including 13 normal and 8 benign cases. Each imaging set included biplane MMG, DCE-MRI and DWI + T2WI. Five readers were asked to rate the images on a scale of 0 to 100 for the likelihood of the presence of cancer and the BI-RADS category. Confidence level results were used to construct receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each technique. Results: DWI + T2WI showed higher observer performances (area under the curve, AUC, 0.73) and sensitivity (50%) for the detection of non-palpable breast cancer than MMG alone (AUC 0.64; sensitivity 40%) but lower than those of DCE-MRI (AUC 0.93; sensitivity 86%). A combination of MMG and DWI + T2WI exhibited higher sensitivity (69%) compared with that of MMG alone (40%). Conclusion: DWI + T2WI could be useful in screening breast cancer for patients who cannot receive contrast medium and could be used as a new screening technique for breast cancer.
ACCESSION #
55530725

 

Related Articles

  • Physicians' Recommendations for Mammography: Do Tailored Messages Make a Difference? Skinner, Celette Sugg; Strecher, Victor J.; Hospers, Harm // American Journal of Public Health;Jan1994, Vol. 84 Issue 1, p43 

    Objectives. Message tailoring, based on individual needs and circumstances, is commonly used to enhance face-to-face patient counseling. Only recently has individual tailoring become feasible for printed messages. This study sought to determine whether printed tailored recommendations addressing...

  • Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening? Drossaert, C. H. C.; Boer, H.; Seydel, E. R. // Journal of Medical Screening;Dec2001, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p204 

    OBJECTIVES:To investigate the impact of an experience of a benign mammographic result on intention to seek medical help immediately in the case of breast abnormalities, and on intentions and thoughts about future participation in screening. SETTING:The Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Programme for...

  • When should we stop mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women? Parnes, Bennett L.; Smith, Peter C.; Conry, Colleen M.; Domke, Henry // Journal of Family Practice;Feb2001, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p110 

    This article presents a study which focused on mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women. There is a lack of evidence to recommend for or against routine screening mammography after the age of 69 years. Mammography screening should be stopped among elderly women who have...

  • Breast Cancer Screening: Comparing the Opinions. Sadovsky, Richard // American Family Physician;1/15/2003, Vol. 67 Issue 2, p401 

    Discusses two studies on breast cancer screening, published on the September 3, 2002 issue of the 'Annals of Internal Medicine.' 'Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale'; 'Screening Mammography for Younger Women: Back to Basics,' by H. Sox.

  • Toward a realistic appraisal of the benefit of breast cancer screening. Lannin, Donald R.; Lockwood, Charles J. // Contemporary OB/GYN;Feb2010, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p8 

    The authors address some questions concerning issues surrounding breast cancer screening guidelines in the U.S. They reference some systematic biases that falsely promote the apparent efficacy of mammography. They mention four categories of cancers that are found on screening mammography. They...

  • L��galit� des femmes devant le d�pistage des cancers du sein: ce qui a chang� en France*. S�radour, B. // Oncologie;mai2006, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p379 

    French breast cancer screening achieved national coverage in 2004. Pilot programmes were implemented in 1989. Today, women are invited to have a mammogram every two years free of charge and are informed. In 15 years, the quality of mammograms has changed, training of radiologists and evaluation...

  • Mammography screening nearly halves breast cancer mortality. Mayor, Susan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);5/3/2003, Vol. 326 Issue 7396, p949 

    Reports that mammography screening has cut the number of deaths from breast cancer by almost half. Studies of screening programs in Sweden and the Netherlands; Results of the study that show that screening in younger women reduces mortality; Comments from Laszlo Tabar, professor of radiology at...

  • Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms. REDONDO, A.; COMAS, M.; MACIÀ, F.; FERRER, F.; MURTA-NASCIMENTO, C.; MARISTANY, M. T.; MOLINS, E.; SALA, M.; CASTELLS, X. // British Journal of Radiology;Nov2012, Vol. 85 Issue 1019, p1465 

    Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate reader variability in screening mammograms according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment and breast density categories. Methods: A stratified random sample of 100 mammograms was...

  • The Mammography Debate. Berg, Alfred O. // American Family Physician;12/15/2002, Vol. 66 Issue 12, p2211 

    Editorial. Comments on the debate on the benefits of using mammography in breast cancer screening. Arguments regarding the use of mammography on younger women; Implications of research findings on mammography; Benefits of mammography in breast cancer screening.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics