Detection of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using unenhanced diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison with mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Yabuuchi, Hidetake; Matsuo, Yoshio; Sunami, Shunya; Kamitani, Takeshi; Kawanami^1, Satoshi; Setoguchi, Taro; Sakai, Shuji; Hatakenaka, Masamitsu; Kubo, Makoto; Tokunaga, Eriko; Yamamoto, Hidetaka; Honda, Hiroshi
January 2011
European Radiology;Jan2011, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p11
Academic Journal
Objective: To compare the detectability of non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women by using mammography (MMG), dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) and unenhanced MR imaging with combined diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted images (DWI + T2WI). Methods: Forty-two lesions in 42 patients with non-palpable breast cancer in asymptomatic women were enrolled. For the reading test, we prepared a control including 13 normal and 8 benign cases. Each imaging set included biplane MMG, DCE-MRI and DWI + T2WI. Five readers were asked to rate the images on a scale of 0 to 100 for the likelihood of the presence of cancer and the BI-RADS category. Confidence level results were used to construct receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each technique. Results: DWI + T2WI showed higher observer performances (area under the curve, AUC, 0.73) and sensitivity (50%) for the detection of non-palpable breast cancer than MMG alone (AUC 0.64; sensitivity 40%) but lower than those of DCE-MRI (AUC 0.93; sensitivity 86%). A combination of MMG and DWI + T2WI exhibited higher sensitivity (69%) compared with that of MMG alone (40%). Conclusion: DWI + T2WI could be useful in screening breast cancer for patients who cannot receive contrast medium and could be used as a new screening technique for breast cancer.


Related Articles

  • The Limitations of Breast Cancer Screening for First-Degree Relatives of Breast Cancer Patients. Neugut, Alfred I.; Jacobson, Judith S. // American Journal of Public Health;Jun95, Vol. 85 Issue 6, p832 

    Bitter controversy surrounds the recommendation of mammographic breast-cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years of average risk. This paper considers the case for screening women in their 40s with higher risk, specifically women who have one or more first-degree relatives with breast...

  • Physicians' Recommendations for Mammography: Do Tailored Messages Make a Difference? Skinner, Celette Sugg; Strecher, Victor J.; Hospers, Harm // American Journal of Public Health;Jan1994, Vol. 84 Issue 1, p43 

    Objectives. Message tailoring, based on individual needs and circumstances, is commonly used to enhance face-to-face patient counseling. Only recently has individual tailoring become feasible for printed messages. This study sought to determine whether printed tailored recommendations addressing...

  • When should we stop mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women? Parnes, Bennett L.; Smith, Peter C.; Conry, Colleen M.; Domke, Henry // Journal of Family Practice;Feb2001, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p110 

    This article presents a study which focused on mammography screening for breast cancer in elderly women. There is a lack of evidence to recommend for or against routine screening mammography after the age of 69 years. Mammography screening should be stopped among elderly women who have...

  • Does mammographic screening and a negative result affect attitudes towards future breast screening? Drossaert, C. H. C.; Boer, H.; Seydel, E. R. // Journal of Medical Screening;Dec2001, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p204 

    OBJECTIVES:To investigate the impact of an experience of a benign mammographic result on intention to seek medical help immediately in the case of breast abnormalities, and on intentions and thoughts about future participation in screening. SETTING:The Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Programme for...

  • Breast Cancer Screening: Comparing the Opinions. Sadovsky, Richard // American Family Physician;1/15/2003, Vol. 67 Issue 2, p401 

    Discusses two studies on breast cancer screening, published on the September 3, 2002 issue of the 'Annals of Internal Medicine.' 'Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale'; 'Screening Mammography for Younger Women: Back to Basics,' by H. Sox.

  • Toward a realistic appraisal of the benefit of breast cancer screening. Lannin, Donald R.; Lockwood, Charles J. // Contemporary OB/GYN;Feb2010, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p8 

    The authors address some questions concerning issues surrounding breast cancer screening guidelines in the U.S. They reference some systematic biases that falsely promote the apparent efficacy of mammography. They mention four categories of cancers that are found on screening mammography. They...

  • L��galit� des femmes devant le d�pistage des cancers du sein: ce qui a chang� en France*. S�radour, B. // Oncologie;mai2006, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p379 

    French breast cancer screening achieved national coverage in 2004. Pilot programmes were implemented in 1989. Today, women are invited to have a mammogram every two years free of charge and are informed. In 15 years, the quality of mammograms has changed, training of radiologists and evaluation...

  • Mammography screening nearly halves breast cancer mortality. Mayor, Susan // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);5/3/2003, Vol. 326 Issue 7396, p949 

    Reports that mammography screening has cut the number of deaths from breast cancer by almost half. Studies of screening programs in Sweden and the Netherlands; Results of the study that show that screening in younger women reduces mortality; Comments from Laszlo Tabar, professor of radiology at...

  • Mammograms have never been more convenient. Halstead, Jan // Nursing Standard;4/13/2011, Vol. 25 Issue 32, p29 

    Some people will always avoid their check-ups, says Jan Halstead.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics