UK rights may be unlawful

October 2010
People Management;10/28/2010, p28
The article discusses the British court case Roca Alvarez v. Sesa Start Espana, which could extend maternity leave benefits to fathers as well as mothers.


Related Articles

  • Supervisor overpromises leave, nearly costs firm $2 million.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;2/4/2011, Vol. 6 Issue 137, p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff has sued the company she has worked with due to verbal contract and Maternity Leave Act violation.

  • Ohio Supreme Court OKs maternity leave waiting period.  // HR Specialist: Ohio Employment Law;Sep2010, Vol. 4 Issue 9, p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled a policy for nursing home, in which it states that a one year of service before given a maternity leave does not violate a state law.

  • You make the call.  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;9/23/2011, Vol. 7 Issue 153, p2 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a pregnant employee filed a case against the company on the basis of pregnancy discrimination in the U.S. The ruling of the court reveals that losing the employee's job while she was on maternity leave was no coincidence and added that there was no...

  • CASH ON DELIVERY. Carp, Juliet // People Management;5/6/2004, Vol. 10 Issue 9, p18 

    Discusses the rulings issued by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on cases related to maternity pay. Basis of earnings-related statutory maternity pay (SMP); Percentage of SMP that an employer can recoup through the national insurance system according to ECJ decision on Alabaster versus...

  • PREGNANCY CASE DEMONSTRATES SUPREME COURT'S UNPREDICTABILITY. Schoeff Jr., Mark // Workforce Management;6/22/2009, Vol. 88 Issue 7, p11 

    The article focuses on a court case in which, Noreen Hulteen, who retired after being laid off in 1994, claimed her pension benefits have been reduced because 210 days of her pregnancy leave were defined by AT&T as personal leave that did not count toward seniority. The U.S. Supreme Court did...

  • Court rules for AT&T in pension case. Greenwald, Judy // Business Insurance;5/25/2009, Vol. 43 Issue 21, p4 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the court decided that the Pregnancy Discrimination Act is not necessarily violated by an employer which paid pension benefits calculated using standards that are no longer legally acceptable. In AT&T Corp. vs. Noreen Hulteen et al, the court decided...

  • (SUPREME COURT) Justices Rule for Employer in Pregnancy Case Involving Pension Benefits.  // Aging News Alert;5/22/2009, p11 

    The article presents information on the AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen court case in the U.S. The case centers on methods employers use to calculate the effect of pregnancy leave on pension accruals before passage in 1978 of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. The Supreme Court has ruled that employers may...

  • ECJ RULING IS A VICTORY FOR EQUAL PAY.  // People Management;5/19/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 10, p11 

    The article deals with the ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the Michelle Alabaster versus DWP case. The ECJ ruled that any pay rise awarded to a pregnant woman between the beginning of the pay reference period and the end of maternity leave should be included when the amount of...

  • Maternity Leave Policy Can Be Different For Males and Females.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q1, p1 

    The article offers information on a suit filed by an employee claiming that the employer's parental leave policy, which provides six weeks of paid leave to the mother after childbirth and five days of leave to adoptive parents, was an unconstitutional violation of equal protection and was...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics