November 2010
Cambridge Law Journal;Nov2010, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p425
Academic Journal
The article discusses the court case R v. Mendez and Thompson which involved a group of men who attacked a victim with various weapons and eventually stabbed the victim to death. According to the author, R v. Mendez and Thompson highlights the doctrine of joint enterprise liability which allows parties involved in one crime to be convicted of another crime where they had foresight that the second crime could occur.


Related Articles

  • The "Libel-Proof" Doctrine as a Legal Defense. Youm, Kyu Ho // Newspaper Research Journal;Winter1991, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p46 

    The article informs that some American courts have applied a "libel-proof" doctrine to libel actions. Under the doctrine, when a plaintiff's reputation is so diminished that only nominal damages could be awarded because his reputation is incapable of sustaining further harm, the plaintiff is...

  • WHY IS TORTURE "DIFFERENT" AND HOW "DIFFERENT" IS IT? Colb, Sherry F. // Cardozo Law Review;Mar2009, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p1411 

    Almost every serious commentator to address the moral and legal question of torture has taken for granted the proposition that the infliction of torture is a sufficiently grave evil to require a distinctly demanding moral scrutiny, one that categorically sets torture apart from other terrible...

  • Court of Appeal. Gillespie, Alisdair A. // Journal of Criminal Law;Feb2011, Vol. 75 Issue 1, p12 

    This article discusses a court case involving an appellant who pleaded guilty to manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility under section 2(1) of the Homicide Act 1957. He was convicted of murder before Ipswich Crown Court in England after the jury rejected the concessionary defence of...

  • O.J. on Our Mind. Buckley Jr., Wm. F. // National Review;6/26/1995, Vol. 47 Issue 12, p71 

    This article focuses on the O. J. Simpson trial. Specifically, the author suggests that the DNA findings should be enough to establish the guilt of 0. J. Simpson. According to the author, those who wish to hold open the question whether O. J. Simpson is guilty have got to resort to terribly...

  • Court Upholds Limitation of Liability to $250. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Sep2005, Vol. 35 Issue 9, p42 

    This article reports that in a recent Alabama case, the court overturned a jury verdict, and as a matter of law, upheld the limitation of liability clause in the alarm company's contract. In the case at hand, the plaintiff sued the defendant alarm company for negligence, breach of contract and...

  • Solicitors to shun advocacy as criminal barristers strike. Harris, Joanne // Lawyer;9/19/2005, Vol. 19 Issue 36, p1 

    Suggests that British solicitors will refuse to carry out advocacy in criminal cases during the forthcoming criminal bar strike, even if a court demands that they appear. Instruction issued by the Law Society to solicitors on not acting or continuing to act, if a client cannot be represented...

  • Culpability, Kingston and the Law Commission. Crosby, Cath // Journal of Criminal Law;Oct2010, Vol. 74 Issue 5, p434 

    This article considers the basis upon which a person should be held to be criminally liable, and to do so, it is necessary to examine the leading theories of character and choice that underpin the State holding a person to be culpable of a criminal offence, i.e. the link between culpability and...

  • Court of Appeal. Hughes, David; Gillespie, Alisdair A.; Wake, Nicola; Middleton, Ben // Journal of Criminal Law;Feb2009, Vol. 73 Issue 1, p12 

    The article discusses several criminal court cases. In one case, the defendants, Yvette Luffman and Wayne Briscoe, were convicted for counselling and commissioning a crime. In another case, the respondent had stood a trial for an offense of dishonestly handling nine mobile telephones, knowing...

  • Blast from the past. Srivastava, Amitabh // India Today;9/21/2009, p7 

    The article reprots that the 18-year-old case against Chief Minister Nitish Kumar is being reviewed by the Patna High Court in India. The case is regarding the murder of Congress supporter Sitaram Singh, who was killed on a polling day in Barh in 1991. Summons were issued against Nitish and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics