Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test

Hubbard, Rebecca A; Miglioretti, Diana L; Smith, Robert A
October 2010
Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Oct2010, Vol. 19 Issue 5, p429
Academic Journal
The goal of a screening test is to reduce morbidity and mortality through the early detection of disease; but the benefits of screening must be weighed against potential harms, such as false-positive (FP) results, which may lead to increased healthcare costs, patient anxiety, and other adverse outcomes associated with diagnostic follow-up procedures. Accurate estimation of the cumulative risk of an FP test after multiple screening rounds is important for program evaluation and goal setting, as well as informing individuals undergoing screening what they should expect from testing over time. Estimation of the cumulative FP risk is complicated by the existence of censoring and possible dependence of the censoring time on the event history. Current statistical methods for estimating the cumulative FP risk from censored data follow two distinct approaches, either conditioning on the number of screening tests observed or marginalizing over this random variable. We review these current methods, identify their limitations and possibly unrealistic assumptions, and propose simple extensions to address some of these limitations. We discuss areas where additional extensions may be useful. We illustrate methods for estimating the cumulative FP recall risk of screening mammography and investigate the appropriateness of modelling assumptions using 13 years of data collected by the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). In the BCSC data we found evidence of violations of modelling assumptions of both classes of statistical methods. The estimated risk of an FP recall after 10 screening mammograms varied between 58% and 77% depending on the approach used, with an estimate of 63% based on what we feel are the most reasonable modelling assumptions.


Related Articles

  • RISKS OF FALSE-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER SCREENING RESULTS. Levine, Dennis L.; French, Linda // Journal of Family Practice;Jul1998, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p14 

    The article discusses research being done on the risks of false-positive breast cancer screening results. The relatively low (6.5%) rate of false-positive mammograms in this study makes the authors' estimate of cumulative risk after 10 manunograms (49%) a fairly conservative estimate....

  • Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test. Baker, Stuart G // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Jun2011, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p291 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Modelling the cumulative risk of a false positive screening test" in the 2010 issue.

  • Screening tests for lung cancer have high false positives.  // Nursing Standard;6/16/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 41, p16 

    An abstract of the article “Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening,” by J. M. Croswell and others is presented.

  • Predicting the Cumulative Risk of False-Positive Mammograms. Christiansen, Cindy L.; Wang, Fei // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;10/18/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 20, p1657 

    Studies medical records of 2,227 randomly selected women who were aged between 40-69 as of July 1, 1983, to identify variables which affect odds of a false-positive mammogram. Cumulative risk of a false-positive mammogram over nine sequential screenings; Evidence that four patient variables and...

  • Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening. Román, R.; Sala, M.; Salas, D.; Ascunce, N.; Zubizarreta, R.; Castells, X. // Annals of Oncology;Jan2012, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p104 

    Background: Reducing the false-positive risk in breast cancer screening is important. We examined how the screening-protocol and women's characteristics affect the cumulative false-positive risk.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 1 565 364 women aged 45–69 years who...

  • Response from the Author. Hubbard, Rebecca A. // Statistical Methods in Medical Research;Jun2011, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p293 

    A response by Rebecca A. Hubbard to a letter to the editor about their article "Modelling the cumulative risk of a false positive screening test" in the 2010 issue is presented.

  • False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes. Hofvind, Solveig; Ponti, Antonio; Patnick, Julietta; Ascunce, Nieves; Njor, Sisse; Broeders, Mireille; Giordano, Livia; Frigerio, Alfonso; Törnberg, Sven // Journal of Medical Screening;Sep2012, Vol. 19 Issue Supp1, p57 

    Objective To estimate the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening result in European mammographic screening programmes, and examine the rates and procedures of further assessment. Methods A literature review was conducted to identify studies of the cumulative risk of a false-positive...

  • Misleading Statement in Trial on False-Positive Results in Lung Cancer Screening. Sokol, H. Nancy; Croswell, Jennifer M.; Kramer, Barnett S. // Annals of Internal Medicine;8/3/2010, Vol. 153 Issue 3, p210 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial," by J. M. Croswell, S. G. Baker, and P. M. Marcus.

  • Cumulative Incidence of False-Positive Results in Repeated, Multimodal Cancer Screening. Croswell, Jennifer Miller; Kramer, Barnett S.; Kreimer, Aimee R.; Prorok, Phil C.; Jian-Lun Xu; Baker, Stuart G.; Fagerstrom, Richard; Riley, Thomas L.; Clapp, Jonathan D.; Berg, Christine D.; Gohagan, John K.; Andriole, Gerald L.; Chia, David; Church, Timothy R.; Crawford, E. David; Fouad, Mona N.; Gelmann, Edward P.; Lamerato, Lois; Reding, Douglas J.; Schoen, Robert E. // Annals of Family Medicine;May/Jun2009, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p212 

    The article presents a research which examines the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening result and the resulting risk of a diagnostic procedure for an individual participating in multimodal cancer screening. There were 68,436 participants aged 55 to 74 years that were randomized to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics