TITLE

When is Material 'Spent?'

AUTHOR(S)
Bergeson, Lynn L.
PUB. DATE
October 2010
SOURCE
Pollution Engineering;Oct2010, Vol. 42 Issue 10, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit case Howmet Corp v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), August 6, 2010. It mentions that EPA brought an enforcement action and alleged several Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) violations relating to the shipment and use of contaminated aqueous potassium hydroxide (KOH) by Howmet Corp. The court concurred with EPA and concluded that the agency's interpretation of spent material was reasonable.
ACCESSION #
54106705

 

Related Articles

  • REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY REMAINS. Spielvogel, Tamra // State Legislatures;Apr2008, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p16 

    The article discusses a court case State of New Jersey v. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The case involved EPA regulations issued in 2004 and 2005 dealing with clean air regulations designed to reduce ozone and fine particle pollution, diesel emissions from agriculture and...

  • Appeals Court Vacates EPA's MACT Standards.  // Ceramic Industry;May2007, Vol. 157 Issue 5, p6 

    The article reports on a decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards on maximum achievable control technology (MACT) for hazardous air pollutants generated by brick, structural clay ceramic...

  • Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Environmental Law. McKibbin, Anne // George Washington Law Review;Jun2004, Vol. 72 Issue 5, p1039 

    Discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on the case filed by Sierra Club seeking a review of a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which approves a revision to state implementation plans for ozone in Virginia, Maryland and the...

  • Texas Wins Court Fight With EPA Over Flexible Emissions Permits. HOLLY, CHRIS // Energy Daily;8/15/2012, Issue 158, p3 

    The article reports on the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to disapprove flexibility provisions in the Texas state implementation plan (SIP). The EPA blocked the plan that provided emissions...

  • Group sues EPA over fuel economy regs.  // Fleet Owner Blog;7/16/2012, p3 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a petition for review was filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy- and medium-duty trucks. The case was filed by...

  • Greens Sue To Force U.S. Rules On Oil Dispersants. HOLLY, CHRIS // Energy Daily;8/28/2012, Issue 167, p2 

    The article reports on a lawsuit filed by wildlife and public health groups in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska against the rules issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on chemical oil dispersants. The lawsuit asks the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to...

  • NRDC v. EPA: Another Battle over Ozone NAAQS. Nguyen, Adam // Ecology Law Quarterly;2012, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p651 

    The article discusses the District of Columbia Circuit court case Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), wherein an issuance of the EPA's Fee Program Guidance (FPG) was held unwarranted in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Court...

  • States Appeal EPA's Decision Not to Impose NSPS for Greenhouse Gasses on Oil Refineries.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q3, Special section p1 

    The article discusses an appeal against the final rule concerning greenhouse gases on petroleum refineries issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) filed at the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The changes to the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for...

  • EPA's Fuzzy Bright Line Approach to Residual Risk. Jackson, Alex // Ecology Law Quarterly;2009, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p439 

    Since its passage in 1970, section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) has regulated the health risks associated with exposure to hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Risk managers at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) entrusted with implementing section 112, however, often know little about the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics