Nordion retreats from defamation lawsuit
- UPDATES. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p6
The article offers world news briefs. The poor performance of Iran in the previous World Cup seemed to prevail as the main reason for its not joining the 2006 World Cup, although it was noted that it is their nuclear ambitions that prohibit the country from joining the game so. On the other...
- New direction recommended for isotope production. Collier, Roger // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;2/9/2010 Supplement, Vol. 182, pE115
The article reports that Canada will move in the opposite direction of the approach on isotope production through MDS Nordion and Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL). According to Alan J. Kuperman, director of the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Program at the University of Texas, the 4 general...
- Defamation: time limits reduced. // Accountancy;Mar1986, Vol. 97 Issue 1111, p30
Reports that the 57th section of the Administration of Justice Act of 1985 in Great Britain changes the time limits for actions for libel and slander. Reduction from six to three years from publication.
- ONLY IN AMERICA (Cont'd). // Fortune;12/27/1993, Vol. 128 Issue 16, p141
An excerpt from an article published in the "Wall Street Journal" is presented.
- Owner Not Liable for Defamation Against Former Resident. // Apartment Building Management Insider;2009, Vol. 23 Issue 13, p5
The article discusses a court case wherein a former resident sued the owner and property manager of the apartment that he formerly rented for defamation.
- Judge throws out suit against editor. // Advocate;7/8/70, Vol. 4 Issue 10, p22
Reports on the dismissal of a complaint of criminal defamation filed by a police official against the editor of the periodical 'Mattachine Midwest,' in Chicago, Illinois. Reason for filing the complaint; Grounds on which the case was dismissed.
- Takeover panel 'privileged'. Kobrin, David // Accountancy;Feb1981, Vol. 92 Issue 1050, p96
Discusses a High Court in Great Britain's ruling on the libel case of Graff v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers. Case background; Upholding of the Takeover Panel's defense of qualified privilege.
- NO NAME IS NO DEFENCE. Chandler, Ainslie // BRW;3/11/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p55
The article discusses a court case wherein defamation actions were filed against three contributors of the HotCopper investment website by DataMotion Asia Pacific after comments made about the firm's managing director Ronald Moir in Australia.
- Doctors and defamation. // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/4/1985, Vol. 290 Issue 6478, p1342
Focuses on the important things of defamation actions. Aim to redress injury to reputation; Cause on the action of slander and libel; Defenses of defamation against civil action.