Pandemic influenza control in Europe and the constraints resulting from incoherent public health laws

Martin, Robyn; Conseil, Alexandra; Longstaff, Abie; Kodo, Jimmy; Siegert, Joachim; Duguet, Anne-Marie; de Faria, Paula Lobato; Haringhuizen, George; Espin, Jaime; Coker, Richard
January 2010
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p532
Academic Journal
Background: With the emergence of influenza H1N1v the world is facing its first 21st century global pandemic. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and avian influenza H5N1 prompted development of pandemic preparedness plans. National systems of public health law are essential for public health stewardship and for the implementation of public health policy[1]. International coherence will contribute to effective regional and global responses. However little research has been undertaken on how law works as a tool for disease control in Europe. With co-funding from the European Union, we investigated the extent to which laws across Europe support or constrain pandemic preparedness planning, and whether national differences are likely to constrain control efforts. Methods: We undertook a survey of national public health laws across 32 European states using a questionnaire designed around a disease scenario based on pandemic influenza. Questionnaire results were reviewed in workshops, analysing how differences between national laws might support or hinder regional responses to pandemic influenza. Respondents examined the impact of national laws on the movements of information, goods, services and people across borders in a time of pandemic, the capacity for surveillance, case detection, case management and community control, the deployment of strategies of prevention, containment, mitigation and recovery and the identification of commonalities and disconnects across states. Results: Results of this study show differences across Europe in the extent to which national pandemic policy and pandemic plans have been integrated with public health laws. We found significant differences in legislation and in the legitimacy of strategic plans. States differ in the range and the nature of intervention measures authorized by law, the extent to which borders could be closed to movement of persons and goods during a pandemic, and access to healthcare of non-resident persons. Some states propose use of emergency powers that might potentially override human rights protections while other states propose to limit interventions to those authorized by public health laws. Conclusion: These differences could create problems for European strategies if an evolving influenza pandemic results in more serious public health challenges or, indeed, if a novel disease other than influenza emerges with pandemic potential. There is insufficient understanding across Europe of the role and importance of law in pandemic planning. States need to build capacity in public health law to support disease prevention and control policies. Our research suggests that states would welcome further guidance from the EU on management of a pandemic, and guidance to assist in greater commonality of legal approaches across states.


Related Articles

  • Health policy in the European Union: how it's made and how to influence it. Duncan, Ben // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);4/27/2002, Vol. 324 Issue 7344, p1027 

    Presents an overview of European Union (EU) policies relevant to medicine and public health, an insight into how these policies are made, and how they can be influenced. Argument that EU laws can and do have a major impact on health service provision, despite the best attempts of national...

  • Developing the agenda for European Union collaboration on non-communicable diseases research in Sub-Saharan Africa. McCarthy, Mark; Maher, Dermot; Ly, Adama; Ndip, Agbor // Health Research Policy & Systems;2010, Vol. 8, p13 

    Background: Health research is increasing in Africa, but most resources are currently chanelled towards infectious diseases and health system development. While infectious diseases remain a heavy burden for some African countries, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for more...

  • Is the Quarantine Act relevant? Schabas, Richard // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal Supplement;6/19/2007, Vol. 176 Issue 13, p1840 

    The author reflects on the necessity for the Quarantine Act which aims to prepare Canada for an influenza pandemic. He defines quarantine as restrictions placed on the entrance and exit of the premises of communicable disease. He believes that quarantine is an ancient practice to control the...

  • Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. King, Katherine F.; Kolopack, Pamela; Merritt, Maria W.; Lavery, James V. // BMC Medical Ethics;2014, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p35 

    Background: Biomedical research is increasingly globalized with ever more research conducted in low and middle-income countries. This trend raises a host of ethical concerns and critiques. While community engagement (CE) has been proposed as an ethically important practice for global biomedical...

  • EC proposals to update avian influenza controls.  // Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association;5/7/2005, Vol. 156 Issue 19, p590 

    Reports on the adoption of a directive that would update measures for the control of avian influenza by the European Union's European Commission on April 28, 2005. Basis of the proposed directive; Aim of the directive to minimize the health risk and negative impact on society in the event of an...

  • Choosing Public Health Dentistry as a Career: A Cross-Sectional Study. GUNTIPALLI, M. NAIDU; PRASAD, M. GHANASYAM; KANDREGULA, CHAITANYA RAM; BABBURI, SURESH; PRATAP, K. V. N. R. // Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research;Feb2014, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p199 

    Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the attitude of dental students towards considering Public Health Dentistry as their future career. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire based, cross-sectional survey was conducted, which included dental students from different years of...

  • EU public health strategy 2008—2013: The EU Council and the Commission urge Member States to focus on health policies: Financing health: OECD reports about health in Denmark and Iceland.  // Scandinavian Journal of Public Health;May2008, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p17 

    The article reports on the demand of the European Union (EU) Council towards Member States to focus on health policies. In October 2007, the EU Commission adopted a White Paper on a new common public health strategy. The Commission says that the overall strategy aims to help foster good health...

  • The impact of European Union law on public health. Hodgson, John // British Journal of Nursing;3/26/2009, Vol. 18 Issue 6, p378 

    The previous articles on the European Union and health law have looked at the effect of EU law on the practitioner and on the patient. This article considers the impact on public health. This is a broad concept, and the impact of EU law is equally broadly felt. There is a general recognition of...

  • A European mid-way strategy status: more research is needed.  // Scandinavian Journal of Public Health;Jul2010, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p555 

    The author reports that the Together for Health Strategy in the European Union (EU) has been extended to 2020. Paola Testori Coggi, the EU’s Health and Consumers Director General has asked stakeholders to strengthen the Together for Health Strategy. The author suggests that a tool to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics