A knowledge management tool for public health: health-evidence.ca

Dobbins, Maureen; DeCorby, Kara; Robeson, Paula; Husson, Heather; Tirilis, Daiva; Greco, Lori
January 2010
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p496
Academic Journal
Background: The ultimate goal of knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) activities is to facilitate incorporation of research knowledge into program and policy development decision making. Evidence-informed decision making involves translation of the best available evidence from a systematically collected, appraised, and analyzed body of knowledge. Knowledge management (KM) is emerging as a key factor contributing to the realization of evidence-informed public health decision making. The goal of health-evidence.ca is to promote evidence-informed public health decision making through facilitation of decision maker access to, retrieval, and use of the best available synthesized research evidence evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions. Methods: The systematic reviews that populate health evidence.ca are identified through an extensive search (1985-present) of 7 electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, BIOSIS, and SportDiscus; handsearching of over 20 journals; and reference list searches of all relevant reviews. Reviews are assessed for relevance and quality by two independent reviewers. Commonly-used public health terms are used to assign key words to each review, and project staff members compose short summaries highlighting results and implications for policy and practice. Results: As of June 2010, there are 1913 reviews in the health-evidence.ca registry in 21 public health and health promotion topic areas. Of these, 78% have been assessed as being of strong or moderate methodological quality. Health-evidence.ca receives approximately 35,000 visits per year, 20,596 of which are unique visitors, representing approximately 100 visits per day. Just under half of all visitors return to the site, with the average user spending six minutes and visiting seven pages per visit. Public health nurses, program managers, health promotion workers, researchers, and program coordinators are among the largest groups of registered users, followed by librarians, dieticians, medical officers of health, and nutritionists. The majority of users (67%) access the website from direct traffic (e.g., have the health-evidence.ca webpage bookmarked, or type it directly into their browser). Conclusions: Consistent use of health-evidence.ca and particularly the searching for reviews that correspond with current public health priorities illustrates that health-evidence.ca may be playing an important role in achieving evidence-informed public health decision making.


Related Articles

  • Capturing complexity: integrating health and education research to inform health-promoting schools policy and practice. Rowling, Louise; Jeffreys, Vicki // Health Education Research;Oct2006, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p705 

    Despite the intersectoral nature of health promotion practice many programs limit their evidence base to health sector research and do not draw on evidence from other sectors' research in program design. To help ensure programs are relevant and acceptable to intersectoral partners and intended...

  • FROM THE GUEST EDITOR. Thirty years of Primary Nursing. MILLER, DIANE A. // Creative Nursing;1998, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p3 

    The article focuses on the responsibilities of primary nurses, which include health promotion, patient advocacy, and problem solving. Topics include care delivery systems, the division of patient care (also known as fragmented care), and work allocation. Information is provided on nursing...

  • Do No Harm: Progression Policies and High-Stakes Testing in Nursing Education. Spurlock, Jr., Darrell // Journal of Nursing Education;Aug2006, Vol. 45 Issue 8, p297 

    Many schools of nursing are adopting progression policies to ensure that school licensure pass rates remain above acceptable levels. These policies prevent students who are predicted to fail the licensure examination from taking the examination, usually by preventing graduation from or...

  • Scotland's community nursing review: the latest. Griffiths, Julie // Primary Health Care;Oct2007, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p12 

    The article reports on the impact of community nursing review on nursing services in Scotland. The review discovers the lack of preparation on health promotion and interventions, problem solving skills and the continuity and coordination among community nursing. It creates a new service model to...

  • What's new on OJIN ?  // American Nurse;May/Jun2010, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p13 

    The article presents an online recap of articles in the "Online Journal of Issues in Nursing" posted May 31, 2010 including the "Developing Delegation Skills," by Alice Weydt, "Mindful Communication: A Novel Approach to Improving Delegation and Increasing Patient Safety," by Mary K. Anthony, and...

  • The Worksite Health Promotion Capacity Instrument (WHPCI): development, validation and approaches for determining companies¿ levels of health promotion capacity. Jung, Julia; Nitzsche, Anika; Neumann, Melanie; Wirtz, Markus; Kowalski, Christoph; Wasem, Jürgen; Stieler-Lorenz, Brigitte; Pfaff, Holger // BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p550 

    Background: The Worksite Health Promotion Capacity Instrument (WHPCI) was developed to assess two key factors for effective worksite health promotion: collective willingness and the systematic implementation of health promotion activities in companies. This study evaluates the diagnostic...

  • Health Education--A Bridge to the Community. Conant Jr., Richard K.; Deluca, A. J.; Levin, Lowell S. // American Journal of Public Health;Sep1972, Vol. 62 Issue 9, p1239 

    A report is presented on a hospital based health education project, including its origin, development, operation and results.

  • Participatory Health Research with Immigrant Communities in Germany. von Unger, Hella // International Journal of Action Research;2012, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p266 

    Participatory health research is a valuable tool for collaboratively identifying health problems, developing solutions and taking action in community settings. This article describes a participatory health research project with immigrant communities in Germany in the field of health promotion...

  • Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research. Doyle, J.; Waters, E.; Yach, D.; McQueen, D.; de Francisco, A.; Stewart, T.; Reddy, P.; Gulmezoglu, A. M.; Galea, G.; Portela, P. // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Mar2005, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p193 

    Background: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions are increasingly being conducted to assist public policy decision making. Many intra-country initiatives have been established to conduct systematic reviews in their relevant public health areas. The Cochrane...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics