TITLE

NIFA-II or 'Bretton Woods-II'?: The G-20 (Leaders) summit process on managing global financial markets and the world economy - quo vadis?

AUTHOR(S)
Norton, Joseph J.
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Journal of Banking Regulation;Sep2010, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p261
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Since November 2008, there have been four historic G-20 Leaders meetings (with a fifth scheduled for Korea in November 2010), in lieu of the traditional G-8 Heads of State meeting format, to address the current Global Financial Crisis and other related economic matters of global concern. This new global governance rubric has been denominated by the G-20 Leaders (representing 80 per cent of the world's population and 90 per cent of world GDP) as the 'premier' forum as to future international economic cooperation. This new governance model is rooted in a short and medium-term 'Action Plan' and within a broader and longer-term 'Global Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth' (a new global growth model under the G-20 Leaders' direction).This article considers retrospectively the roots of this new economic governance paradigm and prospectively whether and in what ways this framework/process might signal a new international collaborative approach to global economic governance for securing 'financial stability' as a 'global public good' (that is, a 'new international financial architecture') and otherwise for better rationalizing the policy management of the global economy and the underlying globalization processes. Will this G-20 (Leaders) process prove to be able to function constructively and on a consensus basis as the G-7/8 tried to do previously; and, will it provide the global platform and umbrella framework within which a 'new Global Deal', and 'Grand Bargain' - a new 'Bretton Woods II' economic, monetary and financial World Order - might evolve so as meaningfully to direct and coordinate global monetary, financial, development, investment, trade and other related global policy considerations (for example, labour, energy, and environmental issues)? Or will this process prove to be merely an ad hoc enhancement of existing global instruments, institutions and arrangements that were put into place in the mid-to-late 1990s by the G-7/8 in addressing the various financial crises of the 1990s - the so-called 'New International Financial Architecture' (NIFA-I)? Also, in this article, the makeup and nature of the range of informal global financial 'network' arrangements, institutions and instruments generated in advance, otherwise related to NIFA-I, or being generated under the new governance framework will be considered, along with the newly envisioned roles of the IMF, Financial Stability Board, World Bank and OECD. Also, a brief discussion will be undertaken as to whether the G-7/8 forum will continue, and if so, in what context and in what relationship to the new G-20 Leaders framework.
ACCESSION #
54083896

 

Related Articles

  • The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. ÇELİK WILTSE, Evren // Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs;Winter2013, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p7 

    Thus far, the G20 represents the most significant collective attempt to address the 2008 economic crisis by the world's largest economies. It is the only global platform that could serve as an institutional panacea for the protracted economic slowdown that has been experienced since 2008. This...

  • FROM THE CEO. Chung Ki Young // SERI Quarterly;Oct2010, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p2 

    The author focuses on the summit meeting of the Group of Twenty (G20) countries where leaders will gather and discuss global economic issues in Seoul, Korea. It mentions issues that would remind the challenging task in achieving full recovery which include the debt crisis in Europe, the fragile...

  • The Governance Response to the Great Recession: The "Success" of the G20. Vestergaard, Jakob; Wade, Robert // Journal of Economic Issues (Taylor & Francis Ltd);Jun2012, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p481 

    Since its upgrading to heads of government level in late 2008, the G20 claims to be the steering committee for the world economy. It claims three specific big successes: stronger international financial regulation, including the Basel 3 Capital Accord; more effective macroeconomic coordination;...

  • Africa, G-20 and Global Financial Crisis: An Insight into Global Financial Constitution and Emerging Markets of Africa. Ehiobuche, Chris; Mensah, Frederick // Journal of International Diversity;2010, Issue 4, p35 

    As economic integration and liberalization continues to be the practical major option for world's economic sustainability, the investment environment in Africa, multilateral trading, global financing, agriculture, minerals and natural resources, energy, telecommunications and infrastructure,...

  • Conclusion: summary of key findings.  // Global Economic Crisis & Developing Countries: Transmission Chan;2009, p34 

    The article offers information related to the global economic status of developing countries. It discusses the pre-crisis period and noted that global boom has probably injected optimism regarding probability of growth in the developing world and the world at large. It presents the transmission...

  • Armonización contable internacional: ultimátum 2011. Costa, Jordi Perramon // Partida Doble;Jul2010, Vol. 21 Issue 223, p64 

    According to United Nations in 2008 the world faced the worst economic crisis since the Second World War. Though the reasons of the economic depression are different, a group of experts created by the European Commission aimed that the accounting and its regulation contributed in reinforcing the...

  • A Organização Mundial do Comércio e a contenção do protecionismo como reação à crise econômica e financeira global. Martins Cesar, Susan Elizabeth // Meridiano 47 - Boletim de Análise de Conjuntura em Relações I;nov/dez2013, Vol. 14 Issue 140, p11 

    This paper discusses the multilateral trading system's restraining role regarding the adoption of barriers to trade in goods and services as a reaction to the global economic and financial crisis. The paper analyses measures implemented by Brazil and other G20 countries.

  • Wave of Korean Credits.  // FinanceAsia;Oct2010, p40 

    The article presents information on the economic development of Korea during the global financial crisis with respect to the report provided by the G20 summit held in 2010. The economy of the country is compared to that of the Euro zone, China and the U.S. Statistical graphs regarding the...

  • Challenge of International Cooperation and Institutional Design in Financial Supervision: Beyond Transgovernmental Networks. Pan, Eric J. // Chicago Journal of International Law;Summer2010, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p243 

    The article discusses the challenges of International cooperation and institutional design in financial supervision. An overview of the G20, which is a forum composed of finance ministers, central bank governors, and heads of governments of nineteen nations and the European Union (EU) that is...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics