CIGMAT Report Update From This Unique, Industry-Specific Ongoing Research Program

Vipulanadan, C.
September 2010
Underground Construction;Sep2010, Vol. 65 Issue 9, p38
Trade Publication
The article features the Center for Innovative Grouting Materials and Technology (CIGMAT) Research Center in Houston, Texas. Researchers at CIGMAT have worked on various basic and applied research projects which have resulted in more than 120 referred journal and conference publications. CIGMAT is the only national laboratory approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to examine the performance of grouts, coatings, linings as well as other types of materials for civil infrastructures.


Related Articles

  • EPA to analyze industries for pollution prevention plan.  // Paint & Coatings Industry;Apr94, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p30 

    Reports on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) plans for examining different industries in an effort to develop pollution-prevention strategies. EPA's interaction with each industry; Training program in connection with the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992.

  • NEW TOOL AVAILABLE for predicting future effects of ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING.  // Pollution Engineering;Apr2003, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p16 

    Reports on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's launch of a Web-based system for predicting future effects of environmental planning. Benefits offered to universities, advocacy groups, state and local governments and other decision-makers.

  • EM in brief. Nash, James L. // Occupational Hazards;Sep99, Vol. 61 Issue 9, p25 

    Compiles environmental management-related news in the United States as of September 1999. Completion of audit policy revision by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Reduction of EPA budget by the House Appropriations Subcommittee.

  • EPA offers incentives for industries correcting problems.  // Textile World;May95, Vol. 145 Issue 5, p24 

    Reports the incentives offered by the Environmental Protection Agency for companies that voluntarily reveals and make corrections of violations. Details of the offering.

  • EPA supports more market incentives, less command-and-control. Wilson, Fred // Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Fing;9/16/96, Vol. 10 Issue 19, p1B 

    Reports that the US Environmental Protection Agency has initiated partnership programs to support strategic environmental management. Movement toward less command-and-control and more economic incentive; Green Chemistry Program; Water Alliances for Voluntary Efficiency Program; Strategic...

  • Notices: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;4/21/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 76, p22132 

    The article presents a notice from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the proposed withdrawal of One Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), which was established by the agency in March of 2008.

  • EPA Rolls Out Round 2 Of Cleanup Reforms.  // Chemical Market Reporter;01/22/2001, Vol. 259 Issue 4, p27 

    Focuses on the issuance of a second round of reforms designed to ensure that human exposures and groundwater releases are under control by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Significance of the reforms; Comments from Timothy Fields, the agency's assistant administrator; Scope of...

  • Good as Gold. Benton, Douglas J. // Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering;May2004, Vol. 76 Issue 5, pEGB14 

    Provides information on the construction of the Science and Technology Center of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Kansas City, Kansas. Features of the building; Energy-cost-saving measures included in an energy model prepared by a project team; Results of a review conducted by...

  • South Camden Citizens in Action: Siting Decisions, Disparate Impact Discrimination, and Section 1983. Cody, Brendan // Ecology Law Quarterly;2002, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p231 

    Discusses the use of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that prohibit disparate impact discrimination to block the siting of a pollutant-producing facility by South Camden citizens in New Jersey. Details of the case; Discussion on the initial opinion of the District Court...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics