THE ALBANY NINE: RECOGNIZING ALBANY LAW SCHOOL'S ALUMNI JUSTICES OF THE THIRD DEPARTMENT
- The to Bear Arms? // Junior Scholastic;3/10/2008, Vol. 110 Issue 14, p6
The article focuses on the gun-control case, District of Columbia v. Heller, presented before the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Payment Under Protest Not Required From La. Refund Claimant. // Sales & Use Tax Alert;4/1/2013, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p3
The article discusses the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court regarding the case "Tin, Inc. v. Washington Parish Sheriff's Office."
- Court Rules on Contingency Fees for Public Claims. WILLIAMSON, LAUREN // InsideCounsel;Oct2010, Vol. 22 Issue 225, p68
The article discusses the court case County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court of Atlantic Richfield wherein the California Supreme Court ruled that private lawyers can represent government bodies in public claims, on a contingency basis.
- The Supreme Court and You. Brown, Bryan // Junior Scholastic;11/13/2006, Vol. 109 Issue 7, p6
The article provides information on two Supreme Court cases Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District #1 and Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Quicken the Big Winner In Supreme Court Case. McDermott, John // Origination News;Jul2012, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p1
The article presents information on a court case Freeman v. Quicken Loans decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Recent Court of Appeal Cases. Ross, Mike // Chartered Accountants Journal;Apr2001, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p42
Lists cases before the New Zealand Court of Appeal as of April 2001. Yovich & Sons Ltd. v. Yovich; Cyclone Hardware v. Patience & Nicholson; Apple Fields Ltd. v. Damesh Holdings Ltd.
- Court to decide whether post-arrest search was OK. Yost, Pete // Buffalo Law Journal;1/17/2008, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p12
The article reports that the Supreme Court will decide if the evidence in criminal cases should be inhibited following arrest that violate state law in the U.S. It stated that Deputy Virginia Solicitor General Stephen McCullough told the justices that an arrest is constitutionally lawful if...
- Squeezing Buckman out of Pom Wonderful. Reed, Matthew A. // Mass Torts;Winter2013, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p14
The article discusses a court case wherein the Northern District of California's opinions illustrate the malleability of the Ninth Circuit's conclusions. The Ninth Circuit has construed the Supreme Court's opinion in Buckman v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee preempting certain state-law claims...
- HORIZONTAL ERIE AND THE PRESUMPTION OF FORUM LAW. Green, Michael Steven // Michigan Law Review;May2011, Vol. 109 Issue 7, p1237
According to Erie Railroad v. Tompkins and its progeny, a federal court interpreting state law must decide as the state's supreme court would. In this Article, I argue that a state court interpreting the law of a sister state is subject to the same obligation. It must decide as the sister...