TITLE

CPLR 3126 CONDITIONAL ORDERS REQUIRING DISCLOSURE "CAN'T GET NO RESPECT."

AUTHOR(S)
Connors, Patrick M.
PUB. DATE
August 2010
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2010, Vol. 73 Issue 3, p853
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the events in litigation that may result in a Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) 3126 conditional order requiring disclosures. According to the article, conditional order requires the expenditure of substantial time and expense for the court system and the parties. It presents several court decisions in which conditional orders have been issued. Finally, it discusses several established remedies available under CPLR to a party subject to a CPLR 3126 conditional order.
ACCESSION #
53956183

 

Related Articles

  • Offer-of-Judgment Rules and Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study of Automobile Insurance Litigation in the East. Yoon, Albert; Baker, Tom // Vanderbilt Law Review;Jan2006, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p155 

    The article presents a study about judgment rules and the civil litigation system in the U.S. In examining offer-of-judgment rules, economists and legal scholars have focused on Rule 68, given the rule�s primacy at both the state and federal level. The revised Rule 4:58 illustrates how...

  • Civil Procedure Rules. Chaplin, Jeremy H. // Credit Management;Sep2009, p16 

    The article explores the amended Civil Procedure Rules to be implemented in Great Britain effective 2009. The 2009 Rules is characterized by, among which, the introduction of the pre-action behavior Practice Direction (PD), the new definition of an individual in relation to the application of...

  • ARBITRATION PROCEEDING RECORDS -- QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE UNDER CPLR 3102(d) -- DISCOVERY AND INSPECTION DENIED -- REQUIREMENT OF PARTICULARITY.  // Arbitration Journal;Jun1970, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p129 

    The article reviews the U.S. court's decision in the case Johnson, Drake and Piper, Inc. v. The State of New York. In denying the State a right to conduct discovery and inspection of documents relating to the arbitration proceeding between a contractor and subcontractor, the court held that the...

  • Awarding attorney's fees to pro se litigants under rule 11. Spector, Jeremy D. // Michigan Law Review;Jun97, Vol. 95 Issue 7, p2308 

    Discusses the Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (`FRCP') which is among the myriad rules and statutes designed to curb litigation abuse. Description of this rule; Circumstances surrounding it.

  • Table of Cases.  // Netherlands Yearbook of International Law;1995, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p401 

    The article lists national and international cases which include U.S. General Claims Commission v. Mexico, Finucane v. McMahon, and Marbury v. Madison.

  • How to litigate successfully.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;3/14/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 11, p12 

    The article offers guidelines how business can litigate successfully.

  • VI. PROCEDURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENTS. Werner, Ray O.; Hartman, George E. // Journal of Marketing;Oct73, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p94 

    The article presents legal developments in marketing, specifically procedural and miscellaneous developments. The case Morton Eisen on behalf of himself and all other purchasers and sellers of "odd-lots" on the New York Stock Exchange similarly situated v. Carlisle & Jacquelin et al. is...

  • Experts and the Discovery/Disclosure of Protected Communication. Lieberman, George // Defense Counsel Journal;Apr2011, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p220 

    The article discusses the author's view on the challenges concerning the question of disclosure of attorney work product provided to expert witnesses. He is critical on the complicated relationship between the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The author...

  • INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY REFORM IN THE WAKE OF PLAUSIBLE PLEADING STANDARDS. GAINOR, EMILY C. // Boston College Law Review;Sep2011, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p1441 

    This Note advocates for the reform of the federal initial disclosure of documents rule. Plausible pleadings, mandated by Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, provide sufficient foundation to support increased use of initial disclosures as a means to reduce the costs...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics