Defense Planning: DOD Needs to Review the Costs and Benefits of Basing Alternatives for Army Forces in Europe

September 2010
GAO Reports;9/13/2010, p1
Government Document
The article focuses on the need of the U.S. Department of Defense to have a review of the costs and benefits of stationing alternatives for Army Forces in Europe. It examines the extent to which the plans of the Army align with the evolving strategic concept in Europe and the posture plans of the U.S. The importance of comprehensive analysis to allow the Army to have sufficient information to identify the most cost effective approach to maintain military presence in Europe is cited.


Related Articles

  • Army Missions To End At Netherlands Site.  // Defense Daily International;6/23/2006, Vol. 7 Issue 24, p4 

    The article reports on the disclosure of the U.S. Defense Department in May 2006 that it expects to save $13.1 million annually by closing an Army site in the Netherlands as part of European Command's force structure realignment and transformation. By Sept. 30, 2006, the U.S. will cease...

  • Army Leaning Forward On Operational Energy Program, Officials Say. Roosevelt, Ann // Defense Daily;4/29/2011, Vol. 250 Issue 21, p8 

    The article reports that in 2010, the U.S. Army had spent four billion dollars on energy and is developing policy and take actions to improve energy security for both the deployed forces and at its installations. It mentions that out of the total amount, 2.7 billion dollars are used for liquid...

  • A Resource Constrained Environment: A Primer to Thinking About Force Structure Change. Gray, Jeremy; Smith, Rickey // Military Review;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 91 Issue 6, p10 

    The article discusses the concept of force structure in the U.S. Army. According to the article, the Comprehensive Strategy Review of the U.S. executive branch and budgetary cuts to the U.S. Department of Defense will impact the U.S. Army and require it to make force structure decisions on a...

  • Building the 21st-century heavy division. Hartzog, William W.; Diehl, James G. // Military Review;Mar/Apr98, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p91 

    Introduces the Army XXI Division to leaders across the United States government, the Department of Defense and the private sector. Evolution of the Division; Development of the Division; Operational concepts; Five major groups of the 21st-century Army.

  • Executive Protection. Gregory, Lisa // Soldiers;Nov2003, Vol. 58 Issue 11, p32 

    Focuses on the role of the Protective Services Unit (PSU) of the U.S. Army in protecting leaders of the U.S. Department of Defense. Scope of the responsibilities of the unit in providing protection to the Army's senior officials; Key personalities that are included in the PSU agents...

  • U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE. Sullivan, Michael J. // GAO Reports;4/25/2014, p1 

    The presents a letter from U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) director of acquisition and sourcing management Michael J. Sullivan to congressional committees on the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (WSARA). Topics include the waiving of WSARA's competitive prototyping...

  • In With The Old. McLeary, Paul // Defense Technology International;Nov2011, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p30 

    The article looks at the affordable and production-ready vehicle programs introduced by contractors at the Defense Security and Equipment International and the Association of the U.S. Army shows. The trend was caused by U.S. Defense Department and other nations seeking proven technologies and...

  • Additional Cost Information and Stakeholder Input Needed to Assess Military Posture in Europe.  // GAO Reports;2/22/2011, preceding p1 

    The article presents a study conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on military posture management in Europe. GAO assessed the Department of Defense's (DOD) plans and guidance including the reports of DOD on the total cost of military installations and reviewed planning...

  • GETTING A GRIP. Mitchell, Virginia E.; Groell, David H. // Army AL&T Magazine;Jan-Mar2013, p130 

    The article discusses the developments in the operation of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), particularly on the responsible and successful execution of contracts. It cites the importance of the positive control of government furnished property (GFP) to maintain the gains made via government...


Read the Article

Other Topics