TITLE

Health Status After Open Elbow Contracture Release

AUTHOR(S)
Lindenhovius, Anneluuk L. C.; Doornberg, Job N.; Ring, David; Jupiter, Jesse B.
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Sep2010, Vol. 92-A Issue 12, p2187
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Operative contracture release may improve motion of a posttraumatic stiff elbow. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that improvement in ulnohumeral motion after elbow contracture release leads to improvement in general health status and decreases upper-extremity-specific disability. Methods: Twenty-three patients with posttraumatic loss of ≥30° of elbow flexion or extension who elected to have an open elbow capsulectomy completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) preoperatively and at least one year postoperatively. Pain was measured with use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Elbow Evaluation instrument. Four patients underwent additional, subsequent procedures to address residual elbow stiffness. Results: One patient who needed several additional procedures, including a total elbow arthroplasty, was considered to have had a failure of the operative contracture release and was excluded from the analysis; this left twenty-two patients in the study. On the average, the arc of flexion and extension improved from 51° preoperatively to 106° postoperatively; the DASH score, from 38 points to 18 points; the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, from 39 points to 49 points (all p < 0.05); and the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, from 49 points to 54 points (p <0.05). There was no significant correlation between the improvement in the arc of flexion and extension and the improvement in the DASH (p = 0.53), PCS (p = 0.73), or MCS (p = 0.41) score. There also was no correlation between the final arc of flexion and extension and the final DASH score (p = 0.39 for the total score, p = 0.52 for the PCS score, and p = 0.42 for the MCS score). Conclusions: Health status and disability scores improve after open elbow contracture release, but the improvements do not correlate with the improvement in elbow motion. Among multiple objective and subjective factors, pain was a strong predictor of the final general health status and arm-specific disability. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ACCESSION #
53906206

 

Related Articles

  • Is Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty a Reasonable Alternative for Revision Arthroplasty? Austin, Luke; Zmistowski, Benjamin; Chang, Edward; Williams, Gerald // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2531 

    Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) improves function in selected patients with complex shoulder problems. However, we presume patient function would vary if performed primarily or for revision and would vary with other patient-specific factors. Questions/purposes: We compared (1)...

  • Surgical Technique: The Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. Molé, Daniel; Wein, Frank; Dézaly, Charles; Valenti, Philippe; Sirveaux, François // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2461 

    Background: The anterosuperior approach used for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an intermediate between the transacromial approach originally proposed by Paul Grammont and the anterosuperior approach described by D. B. Mackenzie for shoulder arthroplasty. As an alternative to the deltopectoral...

  • A Complication-based Learning Curve From 200 Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasties. Kempton, Laurence; Ankerson, Elizabeth; Wiater, J. // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2496 

    Background: Reported early complication rates in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have widely varied from 0% to 75% in part due to a lack of standard inclusion criteria. In addition, it is unclear whether revision arthroplasty is associated with a higher rate of complications than primary...

  • 4 New Codes Upgrade Your Coding for Revision Arthroplasty of Shoulder And Elbow.  // Part B Insider;11/24/2012, Vol. 13 Issue 42, p330 

    The article discusses the 4 new codes for revision in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty including the removal of prior prostheses in the U.S. It notes that coders can report the new codes for revision for their surgeon's revision arthroplasty services in the shoulder or elbow joint. It mentions...

  • How Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Works. Walker, Matthew; Brooks, Jordan; Willis, Matthew; Frankle, Mark // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2440 

    Background: The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was introduced to treat the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder. Since its introduction, an improved understanding of the biomechanics of rotator cuff deficiency and reverse shoulder arthroplasty has facilitated the development of modern reverse...

  • A History of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Flatow, Evan; Harrison, Alicia // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Sep2011, Vol. 469 Issue 9, p2432 

    Background: Management of the cuff-deficient arthritic shoulder has long been challenging. Early unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty systems were associated with high complication and implant failure rates. The evolution toward the modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty includes many variables of...

  • What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Gartsman, Gary M.; Hasan, Samer S. // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Jan2004, Vol. 86-A Issue 1, p189 

    Discusses developments in shoulder and elbow surgery, presented in several meetings of orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. Comparison of the muscle-firing patterns in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who had two-tendon rotator cuff tears; Use of shock-wave therapy for the...

  • Expanded indications to lead next phase in reverse shoulder arthroplasty concept. Blazek, Nicole // Orthopaedics Today Europe;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p1 

    The article focuses on the increasing popularity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as an innovative shoulder procedure for restoring motion and relieving pain in patients with shoulder injuries.

  • Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with a Prior Anterior Shoulder Dislocation. Matsoukis, J.; Tabib, W.; Guiffault, P.; Mandelbaum, A.; Walch, Gilles; Nemoz, Chantal; Edwards, T. Bradley // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2003, Vol. 85-A Issue 8, p1417 

    Reports results of shoulder arthroplasty in all patients with a prior anterior shoulder dislocation, including both those previously treated operatively and those previously treated nonoperatively. Measures used to evaluate shoulders; Differences observed between the patients treated with a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics