New Brunswick's physician-management plan constitutional: court

Moulton, Donalee
October 2001
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;10/16/2001, Vol. 165 Issue 8, p1085
Academic Journal
Reports on the dismissal by the New Brunswick Court of Appeal of an appeal filed by a group of physicians and the Professional Association of Residents in the Maritime Provinces. How the lawsuit claimed that provincial legislation denying billing numbers to doctors in certain communities was unconstitutional; Possibility of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.


Related Articles

  • Court Dismisses Claim of Superiority by Acupuncture Provider. Rogak, Lawrence N. // Insurance Advocate;8/15/2005, Vol. 116 Issue 17, p14 

    The article reports on a plaintiff sued for first-party nofault benefits in the amount of $789.10, for acupuncture treatment it allegedly provided to its assigner. Plaintiff argued that GEICO improperly reduced its no-fault benefits. Plaintiff billed defendant $90.00 for each of 13 acupuncture...

  • A medical society is KO'd in court.  // Medical Economics;2/18/2005, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p13 

    Reports that the Connecticut Supreme Court upheld a lower court's dismissal of lawsuits filed against Oxford Health Plans and ConnectiCare. Violation of the state's Unfair Trade Practices law; Improper delay and reduction of physician reimbursement.

  • Supreme Court mulling physician-assisted suicide.  // Pharmacy Today;Nov2005, Vol. 11 Issue 11, p3 

    The article reports that the oral arguments in a case that will determine whether physicians can legally prescribe and pharmacists can legally dispense medications that will be intentionally used to end life were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on October 5, 2005. Oregon officials defended the...

  • Abuse of Justice. Shariff, M. Y. // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p5 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Akshardham Judgment I: The Law at Work" by Ravi Nair and "Akshardam: Judgment II: Between Callousness and Complicity" by Saurav Datta in the June 21, 2014 issue.

  • Court of Appeal to rule on Brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Dyer, Clare // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);5/10/1986, Vol. 292 Issue 6530, p1242 

    Focuses on the court case on brightlingsea dispute over restrictive covenant. Ruling of the Court of Appeals on the case; Notification of retirement; Recollection of previous High Court decision.

  • Excerpts From Ruling in Richmond V. J.A. Croson Company.  // Education Week;2/1/1989, Vol. 8 Issue 19, p20 

    Several excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "City of Richmond versus J.A. Croson Co." are presented.

  • Cornell studies double standard on appeal.  // Nation's Restaurant News;8/27/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 35, p22 

    Reports the increasing trend of overturned court decision upon appeal favoring sued employers.

  • NEWS & BRIEFS: Suit and Countersuit--Both Lose.  // Advocate;3/26/75, Issue 160, p5 

    Focuses on the dismissal of the suit which was filed by Boulder, Colorado-based gay organization Boulder Gay Liberation against Boulder-based newspaper 'Daily Camera,' with libel by judge Williams D. Neighbors. Ruling by the judge.

  • JUDGMENTS.  // Westchester County Business Journal;2/20/2012, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p20 

    The article offers information on the judgments given to court cases involving various companies in Westchester County, New York including Acre Associates LLC, AGM Management Consultants Inc., and Gar Painting LLC.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics