TITLE

Networks frown on replacement for RPI-X

AUTHOR(S)
Wood, Janet
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Utility Week;9/10/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the Energy Networks Association (ENA) opposes the plan of the British Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) to replace RPI-X, extending the regulatory period for energy networks.
ACCESSION #
53847778

 

Related Articles

  • Bring on competition in connections. Whitaker, Jayson // Utility Week;4/27/2007, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p13 

    The article focuses on the attempt of Great Britain's Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) to encourage competition in electricity connections. It details the Competition in Connections (CinC) review initiated by Ofgem in May 2006. It cites the factors that are contributing to the...

  • Ofgem sets out disconnection amendments.  // Utility Week;4/2/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p10 

    The article reports that the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) has introduced policy changes which will make it clear that suppliers should proactively ensure that vulnerable customers are not disconnected.

  • Ofgem looks at aggregated wind.  // Utility Week;12/10/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 18, p6 

    The article discusses a report published by the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) in Great Britain that explores the potential of a centralized wind market in light of the upcoming consultation on electricity market reform.

  • All LCNF submissions make grade.  // Utility Week;5/27/2011, Vol. 34 Issue 20, p6 

    The article reports that as of May 2011, six electricity providers in England submitted their preliminary bids for funding, totaling 63.1 million of the 64 million pound allocation available, with the winners to be announced later in November by the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM).

  • Ofqem rethinks route for third-part funding. Wood, Janet // Utility Week;1/28/2011, Vol. 34 Issue 3, p7 

    The article reports that the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) in Great Britain has re-evaluated plans to allow new entrants in the market for gas and electricity transmission networks.

  • Ofgem says trading must be reformed.  // Utility Week;2/22/2013, p4 

    The article focuses on a proposal issued by the British Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) in February 2013 to conduct a review of electricity trading design to address its concerns about the failure of existing arrangements.

  • Network charge volatility splits suppliers.  // Utility Week;10/26/2012, p6 

    The article discusses the differing reactions of energy suppliers and gas network operators on the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets' decision in relation to measures to control volatility in network charges in Great Britain.

  • Ofgem favours high-level Wacc review.  // Utility Week;3/19/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p8 

    The article reports on the plan of the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) to delay the implementation of Transmission Price Control Review 4 (TPCR4) to accommodate RPI-X@20 conclusions in Great Britain until April 2013.

  • Ofgem gets tough with big six. Milne, Roger // Utility Week;3/25/2011, Vol. 34 Issue 11, p5 

    This article reports on the move of the British Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) to propose regular auctions of the generation and simpler pricing of six electric suppliers for household bills.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics