Comparison of a Standard and a Gender-Specific Posterior Cruciate-Substituting High-Flexion Knee Prosthesis: A Prospective, Randomized, Short-Term Outcome Study

Young-Hoo Kim; Yoowang Choi; Jun-Shik Kim
August 2010
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Aug2010, Vol. 92-A Issue 10, p1911
Academic Journal
Background: Recently, much debate has focused on the effect of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to compare clinical and radiographic results as well as femoral component fit in patients receiving either a standard posterior cruciate-substituting LPS-Flex or gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting LPS-Flex total knee prosthesis. Methods: Sequential simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty was performed for eighty-five patients (170 knees). Eighty-five women (mean age, 69.7 years) received a standard LPS-Flex prosthesis in one knee and a gender-specific LPS-Flex prosthesis in the contralateral knee. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.13 years. At each follow-up, the Knee Society score, the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, and radiographs were evaluated. The aspect ratio of the distal part of the femur was compared with those of the standard LPS-Flex prosthesis and the gender-specific LPS-Flex prosthesis. Results: The mean postoperative Knee Society scores (95.5 points in the standard implant group, compared with 96.5 points in the gender-specific implant group) and Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores (90.7 points in the standard implant group, compared with 91.2 points in the gender-specific implant group) were similar in both groups. The mean postoperative WOMAC score was 36.6 points. Postoperatively, the mean ranges of knee motion in the supine position (125° in the standard implant group, compared with 126° in the gender-specific implant group), patient satisfaction (8.3 points in the standard implant group, compared with 8.1 points in the gender-specific implant group), and radiographic results were similar in both groups. The femoral component in the standard implant group fit significantly better than that in the gender-specific implant group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The present study did not show any clinical benefits of a gender-specific LPS-Flex total knee prosthesis at the time of short-term follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether there will be an advantage in terms of longer-term function.


Related Articles

  • Preliminary results after total knee arthroplasty without femoral trochlea: evaluation of clinical results, quality of life and gait function. Fuchs, Susanne; Skwara, Adrian; Rosenbaum, Dieter // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Nov2005, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p664 

    Evaluation of the clinical and functional results of a new prosthetic knee design with conservation of the physiologic properties of the patellofemoral joint. After total knee arthroplasty there are often patella problems. Some of them may be a result of excessive retropatellar pressure caused...

  • Extent of Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis Before Knee Arthroplasty: Multicenter Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Riddle, Daniel; Jiranek, William; Neff, Robert; Whitaker, Derek; Hull, Jason // Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research;Oct2012, Vol. 470 Issue 10, p2836 

    Background: Knee arthroplasty traditionally is recommended for persons with substantial disability and disabling pain attributable to moderate or severe osteoarthritis (OA). Pain and functional status after arthroplasty may be influenced by the extent of knee OA before surgery and recent...

  • Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty. Meijer, Marrigje; Reininga, Inge; Boerboom, Alexander; Stevens, Martin; Bulstra, Sjoerd // International Orthopaedics;Mar2013, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p415 

    Purpose: Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a complex procedure. Depending on the degree of ligament and bone damage, either primary or revision implants are used. The purpose of this study was to compare survival rates of primary implants with revision implants when used during rTKA....

  • International Comparative Evaluation of Fixed-Bearing Non-Posterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacements. Comfort, Thomas; Baste, Valborg; Froufe, Miquel Angel; Namba, Robert; Bordini, Barbara; Robertsson, Otto; Cafri, Guy; Paxton, Elizabeth; Sedrakyan, Art; Graves, Stephen // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;2014 Supplement, Vol. 96 Issue Supp1, p65 

    The article presents a study using unique collaboration of multiple established knee arthroplasty registries, to compare the outcomes of non-posteriorstabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties. The conclusion was that non-posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty performed...

  • International Comparative Evaluation of Knee Replacement with Fixed or Mobile Non-Posterior-Stabilized Implants. Namba, Robert; Graves, Stephen; Robertsson, Otto; Furnes, Ove; Stea, Susanna; Puig-Verdié, Lluis; Hoeffel, Daniel; Cafri, Guy; Paxton, Elizabeth; Sedrakyan, Art // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;2014 Supplement, Vol. 96 Issue Supp1, p52 

    The article presents a study to compare the results of knee replacement with mobile-bearing total knee prostheses with fixed-bearing, non-posterior-stabilized devices. The study utilized an advanced, harmonized distributed analysis of six national and regional joint replacement registries and...

  • A new measurement technique for the tibiofemoral contact point in normal knees and knees with TKR. De Jong, R. J.; Heesterbeek, P. J. C.; Wymenga, A. B. // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Mar2010, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p388 

    Flexion gap instability after cruciate retaining TKR allows paradoxical anterior movement of the femur during flexion. The tibiofemoral contact point (CP) moves anteriorly and produces a decrease in the lever arm of the extensor apparatus. This can provoke patellofemoral, tibiofemoral-joint pain...

  • Periarticular Bupivacaine Injection in Knee Arthroplasty. Al Duwairi, Mohammed; Al Eyadah, Zaid // Middle East Journal of Age & Ageing;Mar2012, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p8 

    Background: Different modes of analgesia have been reported for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Postoperative analgesia with the use of parenteral opioids or epidural analgesia can be associated with side effects. Pain relief is important for postoperative knee rehabilitation, and...

  • Functional improvement after Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision: New observations on the dimensional nature of outcome. Mulhall, Kevin J.; Ghomrawi, Hassan M.; Bershadsky, Boris; Saleh, Khaled J. // Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Research;2007, Vol. 2, p25 

    Background: Despite the numerous outcomes measures described it remains unclear what aspects of patient outcome are important in determining actual improvement following total knee arthroplasty revisions (TKAR). We performed a prospective cohort study of TKAR to determine the components of...

  • Mortality after total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Böhm, P.; Holy, T.; Pietsch-Breitfeld, B.; Meisner, C. // Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Jan2000, Vol. 120 Issue 1/2, p75 

    Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely used procedure in the treatment of severe destruction of the knee joint because of osteoarthrosis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to explore whether there is an increased mortality in patients after TKA with the underlying...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics