TITLE

Astronomy's real priorities

PUB. DATE
September 2001
SOURCE
Nature;9/13/2001, Vol. 413 Issue 6852, p93
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on debates regarding the administration of funding for astronomy programs in the United States. Refusal of the National Academy of Sciences to support a government suggestion that funding programs for astronomy be consolidated within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Call for an interagency coordinating body for astronomy.
ACCESSION #
5342712

 

Related Articles

  • ISS Nations Devising New 'Action Plan'. Taverna, Michael A.; Covault, Craig // Aviation Week & Space Technology;6/10/2002, Vol. 156 Issue 23, p27 

    Reports the action plans addressing a shortfall in the funding of the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Accommodation of the international partner complete with the European and Japanese pressurized module; Reviews on the deployment and launch sequence of the modules;...

  • NASA cuts jeopardise 'real science'. Hecht, Jeff // New Scientist;5/18/91, Vol. 130 Issue 1769, p16 

    Reports on prospects of budget reduction at the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Impact of the budget reduction on NASA programs; John Bahcall of the Institute for Advanced Studies' broadcasting of a letter urging astronomers to phone or write to the House...

  • Mission update. McDowell, Jonathan // Sky & Telescope;Jul98, Vol. 96 Issue 1, p28 

    Presents developments on the astronomical research activities by the US National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) s of July 1998. Orbit of the TRACE satellite launched on April 2, 1998; Delay in the launch of the FUSE satellite on a Delta rocket; NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin's...

  • NASA Kills X-33, X-34, Trims Space Station. Morring Jr., Frank // Aviation Week & Space Technology;3/5/2001, Vol. 154 Issue 10, p24 

    Reports on adjustments being made to the programs of the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to reconcile a flat spending proposal for fiscal 2002 with a shortfall in the International Space Station program. Dropping of the X-33 and X-34 space launch technology...

  • Double blow for US moon plans.  // New Scientist;5/16/2009, Vol. 202 Issue 2708, p7 

    The article reports the decision of the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama order an independent review of the post-shuttle plans of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Obama administration also offered its first detailed budget for NASA, which is $3.1 billion...

  • Budget worries not over for NASA Glenn. Jackson, Tom // Crain's Cleveland Business;2/2/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p3 

    Administrators at the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center won a victory when Ohio lawmakers helped to save the center's technology commercialization effort. Late last month, federal lawmakers wrapped up work on an omnibus appropriations measure for...

  • NASA's Budget Seeks to Jettison A K-12 Program. Trotter, Andrew // Education Week;2/20/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 24, p19 

    The article discusses the impact that U.S. President George W. Bush's 2009 federal budget would have on the educational program offered by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In the proposed budget funding is cut for NASA's elementary and secondary education programs...

  • Analysts, Industry Groups See Mixed News in U.S. Agencies' 2012 Budget Requests. Hill, Jeffrey // Satellite News;2/16/2011, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p1 

    The article informs that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) and the U.S. Department of Defense have advanced their budget proposals for the fiscal year 2012 to the U.S. Congress. Charles Bolden, Administrator of...

  • Ground control. Cho, Adrian // New Scientist;8/25/2001, Vol. 171 Issue 2305, p16 

    Opposes the proposal of leaving to the United States (U.S.) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) the responsibility of funding ground-based telescopes in the U.S. Views of Vanden Bout, director of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Charlottesville, Virginia, on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics