Supreme Court rules on onshore oil

August 2010
Utility Week;8/6/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p10
Trade Publication
The article reports on the British Supreme Court's decision in the lawsuit between Star Energy and Bocardo, wherein it ruled that land rights should be obtained by companies involved in onshore oil production and in coal bed methane production.


Related Articles

  • Landowners lose out on oil extraction windfall. Macrory, Richard // ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Aug2010, Issue 427, p62 

    The article examines the decision of the Supreme Court of Great Britain in the case Star Energy Weald Basin Ltd. v Bocardo SA, favoring the former, an oil extracting firm. The Court has taken into consideration the extent to which landowners can prevent tunnelling work under their land and file...

  • Going underground. Miller, Neil Q.; de St Croix, John // Estates Gazette;8/8/2009, Issue 831, p70 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff was entitled to only to 1,000 British pounds in respect of both the historic and future trespass into its property. In Bocardo SA v. Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd., the British High Court held that the defendant committed a trespass despite...

  • One party that did not strike it rich. Murdoch, John // Estates Gazette;8/1/2009, Issue 930, p65 

    The article discusses the court case, Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd, wherein the defendant companies extracted oil from beneath a Surrey estate owned by Mohammed Al Fayed. In an earlier decision, Judge Peter Smith awarded damages to the landowner equivalent to 9% of the companies'...

  • Xmas cheer for media as libel law gets upgrade. Dowel!, Katy // Lawyer;12/6/2010, Vol. 24 Issue 47, p6 

    The article offers information on the decision of the Supreme Court in Joseph v Spiller, stating that the load on defendants to prove the truth on which comments have been made has been minimized in Great Britain.

  • Correction.  // Prospect;Jul2011, Issue 184, p22 

    A correction to an article by James Grant on the Supreme Court of Great Britain that was published in the June 2011 issue is presented.

  • Asset Fight Goes to U.K. Supreme Court.  // American Banker;12/23/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 197, p16 

    The article discusses a Great Britain Supreme Court case regarding the return of money to clients of the bank Lehman Brothers Europe from funds that were found to be segregated when the bank collapsed in 2008.

  • Silky skills.  // Lawyer (Online Edition);3/25/2014, p13 

    The article focuses on Dinah Rose QC, human rights barrister who is cosidered as the favorite lawyer for handling the Great Britain's Supreme Court cases.

  • Harmony reigns supreme.  // Lawyer (Online Edition);5/29/2014, p1 

    The article discusses reasons behind the decreased disapproval opinions at the Supreme Court of Great Britain.

  • Journalist's appeal rejected. Ricketts, Andy // Third Sector;4/1/2014, Issue 792, p4 

    The article reports on the ruling of the Supreme Court of Great Britain rejecting an application from journalist Dominic Kennedy of "The Times" newspaper that the Charity Commission should release documents relating to questions about a charity founded by Member of Parliament (MP) George Galloway.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics