TITLE

Breast Conservation: Trends in a Major Southern Metropolitan Area Compared with Surrounding Rural Counties

AUTHOR(S)
Answini, Geoffrey A.; Woodard III, Warden L.; Norton, H. James; White Jr, Richard L.
PUB. DATE
October 2001
SOURCE
American Surgeon;Oct2001, Vol. 67 Issue 10, p994
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Despite randomized prospective studies and National Institutes of Health recommendations, surgeons especially in the southern United States have been slow to adopt breast conservation surgery (BCS). Data were analyzed regarding 3349 cases of stage 0, I, and II breast cancer (19911998) from Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, NC; 1057 cases from six surrounding rural counties (1995-1997); and 90,398 cases (1995) from the National Cancer Data Base. During 1995 through 1997 Charlotte-Mecklenburg County had statistically significantly higher rates of BCS compared with six surrounding rural counties for stage I (59% and 42% respectively, P = 0.001) and stage II (37% and 19%, respectively, P = 0.001) breast cancer. The BCS rates in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County (1991-1998) showed the following: Stage 0 rate increased from 17 per cent in 1991 to 78 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001), stage I rate increased from 31 per cent in 1991 to 65 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001), and stage II rate increased from 18 per cent in 1991 to 42 per cent in 1998 (P = 0.001). BCS rates for early-stage breast cancer in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County have increased over the last 8 years and now equal national rates; however, patients in surrounding rural counties are not receiving BCS as frequently. There is a need for more widespread education of surgeons, other health care providers, and the general public to increase the use of BCS.
ACCESSION #
5331375

 

Related Articles

  • `Preventive' breast cancer surgery.  // Mother Jones;May85, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p52 

    There is no known breast condition that would justify a doctor's saying a woman without cancer will get it. Yet thousands of perfectly healthy women are having mastectomies to avoid getting breast cancer. INSET: Watching for breast cancer..

  • Alternative to mastectomy.  // Newsweek;3/25/1985, Vol. 105 Issue 12, p91 

    According to a new report, lumpectomy -- which does not require removal of the breast -- combined with radiation therapy, may be just as effective for some kinds of breast tumors as the traditional mastectomy.

  • Breast implant report.  // American Fitness;Jul92, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p11 

    Reports that as the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) moratorium on silicone gel breast implants continues, women remain uninformed as to the best course of action. Deciding between contradicting FDA, manufacturers and doctors advice; Examinations recommeded; Address of FDA for more...

  • Silicone breast implants.  // Mayo Clinic Health Letter;Jul1992, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p7 

    Presents a review of key points regarding silicone. Restriction by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of two medical uses of silicone; Other uses of silicone; Number of women who have had silicone breast implants during the past 20 years; Subcutaneous mastectomy; Historical use of silicone...

  • Uplifting experiences. Kase, L.M. // Harper's Bazaar;May91, Issue 3353, p161 

    Addresses several concerns over breast augmentation, one of the most sought-after forms of cosmetic surgery. Possible associations with a rare, connective-tissue disease; Potential risks of the new polyurethane-covered implants; Current research on the subject; Proposed alternatives.

  • A body to die for. Fischer, A. // Redbook;Sep91, Vol. 177 Issue 5, p96 

    Examines the growing incidence of breast-implant surgery in the United States, done usually for cosmetic, not medical reasons. Recently health problems have been traced to implants. Health risks; Symptoms; Implant types; Costs; Growing concerns. INSET: Seeking justice.;What dream (breasts) are...

  • New limits, more questions. Findlay, S. // U.S. News & World Report;3/2/92, Vol. 112 Issue 8, p61 

    Outlines the decision made last week by an expert panel of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which recommends that the FDA allow silicone-gel implants to remain available for women but severely restricts who can get them. Those who can get breast implants if the panel's recommendation...

  • Breast surgery: The geography factor.  // U.S. News & World Report;5/4/92, Vol. 112 Issue 17, p19 

    Reports that the chances of a woman's receiving breast-saving surgery as opposed to a mastectomy vary with, of all things, her address, according to two studies in last week's `New England Journal of Medicine.' Breast-cancer patients in New England and the Middle Atlantic states were most...

  • How to rebuild your body and your spirit.  // U.S. News & World Report;7/11/88, Vol. 105 Issue 2, p59 

    Discussion of reconstructive surgery after breast removal. Three basic options detailed; Fears; Emotional factor; Delay after chemotherapy or radiation treatment; Statistics on breast reconstruction.

  • Panel recommends restricting silicone breast implants.  // FDA Consumer;Apr92, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p2 

    Reveals findings of a special advisory panel investigating the benefits and problems associated with breast implants. Expert testimony; Advice to women with implants; Seek accredited mammography facility; Panel recommendations; Testimony before the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) General...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics